Back

Gait parameters, Imaging features, and CSF tap test in idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH). Is composite testing the way to go?

Poudel, S.; Fasano, A.; Dash, D.; Shukla, A. W.; Garg, A.; Upadhyay, A.; Wig, N.; Rajan, R.; Das, A.; MR, D.; Tripathi, M.; Srivastava, A. K.; Kale, S. S.; Chandra, P. S.; Suri, A.; Pal, P.; Kumar, H.; Vibha, D.; Singh, R. K.; Parihar, J.; Saggu, S.; Jadon, R. S.; Meena, V. P.; Prakash, B.; Elavarasi, A.

2025-11-17 neurology
10.1101/2025.11.16.25340322 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is characterized by gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary dysfunction which may improve with ventriculo-peritoneal shunting. This study evaluated the role of conventional MRI features and the CSF tap test (CSF-TT) in predicting shunt responsiveness in iNPH. MethodsThis is an Ambispective cohort study of 40 patients with probable iNPH evaluated between 2019 and 2024. Baseline MRI parameters, gait features, iNPH score, CSF opening pressure were analyzed. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at baseline, 24 hours after CSF-TT, and 24 weeks after VP shunt surgery. CSF-TT responders were defined as at least a 1-point improvement in mRS 24 hours after CSF-TT. The diagnostic performance of individual MRI parameters and composite diagnostic parameters were evaluated. ResultsForty patients underwent CSF-TT. There were no significant differences between CSF-TT responders and non-responders in the baseline clinical gait parameters, the iNPH scale, and MRI findings. Turning disturbance, wide-based stride, and reduced foot clearance showed significant improvement after CSF-TT. Individual MRI parameters and CSF-TT parameters showed limited value in predicting shunt responsiveness. Composite diagnostic criteria combining CSF-TT and CSF opening pressure >18cm H20 showed sensitivity of 62.5 % and specificity of 71.4% with the highest Youden index indicating modest diagnostic accuracy in predicting shunt responsiveness. ConclusionShunt surgery provided significant functional benefit in iNPH. Neither the CSF tap test nor conventional MRI markers alone reliably predicted shunt responsiveness. A multimodal assessment combining imaging, clinical evaluation, and CSF dynamics is required to optimize patient selection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
4
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
7
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.2%
11
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
13
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
14
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
16
Emergency Medicine Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Epilepsia
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%