Back

External quality assessment of BCR-ABL1 quantification in chronic myeloid leukemia: a pilot interlaboratory study from Russia

Khoroshun, E.; Momynaliev, K.; Ivanov, I.

2025-11-17 hematology
10.1101/2025.11.14.25340242 medRxiv
Show abstract

BCR-ABL1 is a chimeric oncogene underlying chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and serves as a key marker for monitoring minimal residual disease. Quantitative RT-qPCR analysis of BCR-ABL1 transcripts enables assessment of molecular response depth and timely detection of treatment failure or resistance. In international practice, the introduction of the International Scale (IS), along with method standardization, has significantly improved the comparability of results between laboratories. Participation in external quality assessment (EQA) programs is a mandatory accreditation requirement in countries with established CML monitoring systems, allowing laboratories to evaluate analytical accuracy and to adjust protocols when deviations are detected. Until recently, Russia lacked both standardized IS calibration and a national EQA program for BCR-ABL1 testing, which hindered the assessment of interlaboratory precision. This pilot study represents the first interlaboratory comparison of quantitative BCR-ABL1 measurement in the Russian Federation. Two panels of lyophilized control samples (five levels each, from M1 to M4.5) were distributed and analyzed by 14 laboratories (15 datasets) using their routine protocols without IS conversion. Interlaboratory variability was high: the overall coefficient of variation ranged from approximately 40 percent to 50 percent, with individual laboratory results at the high level (about 10 percent) varying from 3 percent to 27 percent. Most laboratories results were within plus/minus 3 standard deviations of the consensus median, but two laboratories showed consistent overestimation (bias about +3.8 percentage points) or underestimation (bias about -1.7 percentage points), leading to multi-fold errors at level M1. These findings highlight the urgent need to implement IS calibration and to establish a national EQA program for BCR-ABL1 testing in Russia to improve result comparability. Adoption of these measures will help align molecular monitoring of CML in Russia with international standards and strengthen clinician confidence in laboratory testing

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%