Pre-infection COVID-19 vaccination and long-COVID mental fatigue severity: Findings from the Johns Hopkins COVID Long Study
Sagona, M.; Ni, Z.; Wentz, E.; Yenokyan, K.; Kammerling, T.; DeVito, A.; Duggal, P.; Mehta, S. H.; Lau, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundLong-COVID is a post-acute sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection characterized by persistent, multi-system symptoms. Neurologic symptoms, such as mental fatigue, are often reported. While vaccination prior to infection is known to lessen symptom burden, its impact on mental fatigue remains unclear. ObjectiveExamine the association between vaccination and long-COVID-associated mental fatigue. MethodsWe analyzed data from the Johns Hopkins COVID Long Study, a cohort study of 22,811 participants with and without infection. Among 2,634 participants with complete longitudinal follow-up, we examined the association between pre-infection vaccination and mental fatigue as measured by the Wood Mental Fatigue Inventory (WMFI; range 0-36, with lower scores indicating less fatigue). We considered three groups: long-COVID, recovered, and never infected, with the latter two groups as negative controls. We estimated the score differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants using covariate-adjusted quantile regression and mixed-effects linear models. ResultsAmong participants with long-COVID, receiving a booster dose was associated with lower WMFI scores across the distribution (1.5, 2.6, and 3.8 points lower at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles; p [≤] 0.02) compared to those unvaccinated. Fully vaccinated participants also had lower scores, though these differences were not statistically significant. Findings were consistent in mixed-effect linear models where boosted (4.0 points lower) and fully vaccinated (1.9 points lower) participants with long-COVID had lower WMFI scores (p < 0.05). No associations were observed among recovered or never-infected participants. ConclusionPre-infection vaccination was associated with less long-COVID-associated mental fatigue, with the greatest benefit among boosted participants.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 94%
- The association between prolonged SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and work outcomes 94%
- Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among Those Up-to-Date and Not Up-to-Date on COVID-19 Vaccination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Persistent health issues, adverse events of significant concern, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination- findings from a real-world cohort study of healthcare workers in north India 92%
- Tracking Immunity: Increased number of COVID-19 boosters increases the longevity of anti-RBD and anti-RBD neutralizing antibodies 92%
- Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Infections after Vaccination in North Carolina 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and hybrid immunity in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 among adults in the United States 94%
- mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against COVID-19 among Symptomatic Outpatients Aged ≥16 Years in the United States, February – May 2021 94%
- Recombinant adjuvanted zoster vaccine and reduced risk of COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalization in older adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine Boosting in Persons Already Protected by Natural or Vaccine-Induced Immunity 94%
- Necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in previously infected individuals 93%
- Vaccine effectiveness of CanSino (Adv5-nCoV) COVID-19 vaccine among childcare workers – Mexico, March–December 2021 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.