Back

Automated spermatogenic staging in PAS-stained testes of Sprague-Dawley rats using a deep learning model for nomal and atrophied tissues

Kim, D.-M.; Rho, J.-H.; Wee, S.-Y.; Son, H.-Y.

2025-11-08 pathology
10.1101/2025.11.06.687107 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The spermatogenic stage serves as a vital criterion for assessing normal spermatogenesis and is central to evaluating reproductive toxicity. Current manual methods for spermatogenic stage evaluation are time-intensive, require expert knowledge, and are less effective in detecting subtle changes or comparing stage frequencies across samples. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces a method leveraging the object detection models, Region-based Convolutional Neural Networks (R-CNN), for efficient and accurate spermatogenic stage evaluation. 14 stages were identified using Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS)-stained Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat testicular tissue, and the approach was further applied to atrophied testicular samples as a real-world example. The model achieved a mean average precision of 0.869 and a mean average recall of 0.977 in detecting spermatogenic stages and atrophy. Agreement with pathologist assessments exceeded 91%, providing objective benchmarks for stage evaluation and facilitating the comparison of stage frequencies across multiple samples. In atrophied tissues, the model enabled quantitative grading by analyzing proportional changes in atrophied seminiferous tubules relative to normal tubules. This automated approach reduces the workload of pathologists while delivering rapid and precise assessments of toxicological changes in spermatogenesis. By integrating deep learning models, this study enhances both the accuracy and efficiency of pathological evaluations, offering a transformative tool for reproductive toxicity studies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
20.2%
3
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.0%
5
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
8
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
11
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
12
Aquaculture
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.7%
19
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
BioTechniques
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%