A De Novo Algorithm for Allele Reconstruction from Oxford Nanopore Amplicon Reads, with Application to CYP2D6
Brown, S. D.; Dreolini, L.; Minor, A.; Mozel, M.; Wong, N.; Mar, S.; Lieu, A.; Khan, M.; Carlson, A.; Hrynchak, M.; Holt, R. A.; Missirlis, P. I.
Show abstract
The Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing platform offers a path towards bedside genomics, producing long reads that can completely cover a gene of interest, and thus detect any known or novel variant the gene contains. However, the analysis of these long reads to identify actionable genotypes remains challenging and typically requires customization depending on the target gene. Here, we describe a generic algorithm to accurately reconstruct allele sequences derived from long-reads of genomic-amplicon origin. Rather than calling variants directly from these long-reads, our method takes a "sequence-first" approach, Brown et al. - preprint copy performing an unbiased reconstruction of the underlying amplicon sequences to generate high-confidence reconstructed allele sequences. This is done without user input of the expected target gene, allowing for any source amplicon to be reconstructed. These high-confidence reconstructed allele sequences are then compared to the genomic reference sequence of the gene to infer the specific diplotype present in the sample. This approach is agnostic towards the number of genes and alleles present and readily detects novel variants. We demonstrate our approach using three independent data sets for CYP2D6, a diverse and complex gene with over 175 known alleles of clinical significance affecting drug dosing. We show how our approach can accurately recover validated CYP2D6 diplotypes from 20 Coriell samples sequenced using different primer sets, on different Oxford Nanopore Technologies flow cell versions, and to different depths. This includes inferring occurrences of copy number variation from relative abundances of each allele, a critical factor for ascribing functional effects to a diplotype.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery 94%
- Structural variation of the malaria-associated human glycophorin A-B-E region 93%
- Long read sequencing reveals novel isoforms and insights into splicing regulation during cell state changes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.