Back

Throwing dice, but not always: bet-hedging strategy of parthenogenesis

Chai, Y.

2025-11-06 zoology
10.1101/2025.11.05.686691 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Parthenogenesis, clonal propagation by only female, is a common asexual reproduction model. Without sexual gene recombination, it is hypothesized that the deficiency of genotypic variation and accumulation of deleterious mutations reduce the fitness of parthenogenetic lineages confronted with environmental fluctuations, which is also regarded as evolutionary dead end. There should be specific life-history strategies to explain why parthenogenesis has been existing successfully. We constructed a family pedigree for rotifer spanning six generations, comprising 1200 individuals with identical genetic background in uniform condition, tracing back to the inception of parthenogenesis from single dormant egg. The individual fitness represented by lifespan and fecundity exhibits rich variation, and seems to be determined before birth by maternal stochastic investment among clutches regardless of maternal aging. Alike to "Do not put all your eggs in one basket", this bet-hedging strategy spreads risk of environmental unpredictability. Despite the absence of sexual recombination, the phenotypic fitness failed to achieve fixation and heritability, instead demonstrating transgenerational compensation and trade-offs phenomenon. More siblings mean less children, and vice versa. This can be regarded as intrinsic and innate non-density-dependent self-regulation strategy of population, as limited by the conservation of disposable energy for allocation among offspring. Those strategies are conducive to explain the adaptability of parthenogenesis in evolution.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.5%
3
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.9%
12
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
14
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
15
Genes to Cells
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
21
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
24
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%