Back

The impact of integrating oral health education in cardiac rehabilitation: A randomised controlled trial.

Church, L. A.; King, S.; Marschner, S.; Zecchin, R.; Barrett, N.; Kumar, T.; Sphar, A.; Chow, C. K.

2025-11-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.11.03.25339448 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite the growing body of evidence supporting an association between oral disease and cardiovascular disease (CVD), oral health as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular health is rarely addressed. ObjectiveTo determine whether a novel oral health education program improves oral health related behaviours and knowledge of individuals attending cardiac rehabilitation. MethodsThis randomised clinical trial (1:1:1) in Australian public hospitals compared three interventions: Group A) individualised oral hygiene instruction (OHI) combined with a digital oral health education (DOHE) package, Group B) DOHE alone, or Group C) usual care: no oral health education. All participants received OHI+DOHE after final follow-up. The primary outcome was improvement in oral hygiene, assessed by approximal plaque index (API) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included API reductions at 12 weeks, as well as self-reported changes in oral hygiene behaviours, knowledge, confidence, status, and motivation. ResultsA total of 158 participants were randomised (mean age 62 {+/-} 11 years; 82% males). At six weeks, 77.1% (27/35) of participants receiving OHI+DOHE showed a reduction in API, compared to 26.8% (11/51) receiving usual care (odds ratio [OR] 9.16, 95% CI: 3.34-27.75). Participants receiving DOHE alone showed similar reductions. ConclusionOral health education delivered during cardiac rehabilitation using digital media alone, or in combination with clinician delivered face-to-face messaging improves oral hygiene, behaviours and knowledge among patients with CVD and can be integrated into cardiology care. Trial registrationanzctr.org.au ACTRN12623000449639p

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.