The impact of integrating oral health education in cardiac rehabilitation: A randomised controlled trial.
Church, L. A.; King, S.; Marschner, S.; Zecchin, R.; Barrett, N.; Kumar, T.; Sphar, A.; Chow, C. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite the growing body of evidence supporting an association between oral disease and cardiovascular disease (CVD), oral health as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular health is rarely addressed. ObjectiveTo determine whether a novel oral health education program improves oral health related behaviours and knowledge of individuals attending cardiac rehabilitation. MethodsThis randomised clinical trial (1:1:1) in Australian public hospitals compared three interventions: Group A) individualised oral hygiene instruction (OHI) combined with a digital oral health education (DOHE) package, Group B) DOHE alone, or Group C) usual care: no oral health education. All participants received OHI+DOHE after final follow-up. The primary outcome was improvement in oral hygiene, assessed by approximal plaque index (API) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included API reductions at 12 weeks, as well as self-reported changes in oral hygiene behaviours, knowledge, confidence, status, and motivation. ResultsA total of 158 participants were randomised (mean age 62 {+/-} 11 years; 82% males). At six weeks, 77.1% (27/35) of participants receiving OHI+DOHE showed a reduction in API, compared to 26.8% (11/51) receiving usual care (odds ratio [OR] 9.16, 95% CI: 3.34-27.75). Participants receiving DOHE alone showed similar reductions. ConclusionOral health education delivered during cardiac rehabilitation using digital media alone, or in combination with clinician delivered face-to-face messaging improves oral hygiene, behaviours and knowledge among patients with CVD and can be integrated into cardiology care. Trial registrationanzctr.org.au ACTRN12623000449639p
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of complications among diabetics self-reporting oral health status in Canada: A population-based cohort study 92%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 92%
- Burnout: A Predictor Of Oral Health Impact Profile Among Nigerian Early Career Doctors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 92%
- Protocol for an Economic Evaluation Alongside the Re-Evaluating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions (E-REVISE) Trial 91%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probiotics and synbiotics administered to young infants: perceptions and acceptability amongst carers and healthcare workers in Western Kenya 90%
- Methodological quality of recommendations on vitamin D and calcium – a systematic review of bone health guidelines 90%
- Are probiotics and prebiotics safe for use during pregnancy and lactation? A systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dimethyl fumarate in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial 90%
- Methodological Rigor in COVID-19 Clinical Research: A Systematic Review and Case-Control Analysis 89%
- Assessing capacity to social distance and neighborhood-level health disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 90%
- Effect of a home-based health, nutrition, and responsive stimulation intervention and conditional cash transfers on child development and growth: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Tanzania 89%
- WICID framework Version 1.0: Criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.