Effect of a Third COVID-19 Vaccine Dose on the Incidence of Long COVID Among Adults Who Completed a Primary Vaccine Series: a Target Trial Emulation in a Community-Based Cohort
Shen, Y.; Shahn, Z.; Robertson, M.; Gebo, K.; Nash, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundEvidence on whether a third COVID-19 vaccine dose lowers long COVID risk is mixed. We estimated the effect of receiving [≥]1 third dose versus completing only a primary series on 6- and 12-month long COVID incidence using a target-trial emulation in a U.S. community cohort. MethodsWe analyzed the CHASING COVID Cohort, a prospective, community-based study of U.S. adults. Eligible participants were [≥]18 years, had completed a two-dose primary series, had no prior long COVID, and had no SARS-CoV-2 infection in the 3 months before time zero. Strategies compared were: receive a third dose at time zero vs. not receive a third dose during follow-up. Long COVID was defined as [≥]1 new symptom at or beyond 3 months post-infection with concurrent activity limitation, both absent in the prior year. Follow-up was 6 and 12 months. We used a per-protocol analog: participants were artificially censored upon deviating from their assigned strategy or lost-to-follow-up, with inverse-probability weights to address selection due to censoring and time-varying confounding. We fit weighted pooled logistic models to estimate weighted incidence, differences, and ratios at each horizon. ResultsAcross 16 sequential trials (18,930 person-trials; 4,044 unique individuals), 3,321 person-trials received a third dose at time zero and 15,609 did not. At 6 months, weighted long COVID incidence was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.5%, 1.3%) with a third dose vs. 1.0% (0.8%, 1.1%) without (risk difference (RD), -0.1%; 95% CI, -0.5%, 0.4%; risk ratio (RR), 0.93; 95% CI, 0.54, 1.44). At 12 months, incidence was 4.9% (4.1%, 5.9%) with a third dose vs. 4.5% (4.1%, 4.8%) without (RD, 0.4%; 95% CI, -0.5%, 1.4%; RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.90, 1.33). ConclusionIn this community-based target-trial emulation, receiving a third COVID-19 vaccine dose did not meaningfully reduce 6- or 12-month long COVID incidence compared with completing only a primary series.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against infection and COVID-19 hospitalization with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants: BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 95%
- Waning of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies targeting the Spike protein in individuals post second dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines and risk of breakthrough infections: analysis of the Virus Watch community cohort 95%
- Racial and ethnic differences in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Waning of two-dose BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is robust to depletion-of-susceptibles bias 95%
- Protection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is similar to that of BNT162b2 vaccine protection: A three-month nationwide experience from Israel 94%
- Reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among household contacts with recent vaccination and past COVID-19 infection: results from two multi-site case-ascertained household transmission studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 94%
- Initial protection against Omicron in children and adolescents by BNT162b2 94%
- Protection against Omicron re-infection conferred by prior heterologous SARS-CoV-2 infection, with and without mRNA vaccination 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.