Back

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Patients Referred for Transcatheter Tricuspid Edge-to-Edge Repair: Clinical Characteristics and Impact on Procedure Eligibility

Rdzanek, A.; Piasecki, A.; Lin, J.; Tomaniak, M.; Krolikowska, M.; Matsko, P.; Markiewicz, A.; Janiel, M.; Pedzich, E.; Kapłon-Cieslicka, A.; Ostrowska, E.; Pawłowicz, P.; Trebacz, J.; Gałaska, R.; Stokłosa, P.; Stefaniak, S.; Chmielecki, M.; Denti, P.; Gackowski, A.; Grygier, M.; Pregowski, J.; Grabowski, M.; Scislo, P.; Maisano, F.

2025-11-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.11.03.25339431 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, data regarding the qualification process for T-TEER in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are limited. MethodsThis retrospective, multicenter study included consecutive patients with severe TR referred between January and December 2024 to six tertiary centers (five in Poland, one in Italy) for T-TEER screening. Echocardiographic assessment followed current recommendations using a five-grade TR severity scale. In CIED carriers, the relationship between the tricuspid valve and the lead was classified as CIED-related (direct interference) or CIED-associated (no causal interaction). Heart teams evaluated all cases, recording qualification status and reasons for disqualification. ResultsAmong 271 patients (mean age 77 {+/-} 9 years, 58.3% female), 113 (41.7%) had a CIED. Compared with non-CIED patients, CIED carriers showed higher rates of diabetes mellitus (35.4% vs. 17.1%), chronic kidney disease (70.8% vs. 54.4%), and previous CABG (13.3% vs. 4.4%), and exhibited lower LV ejection fraction (50.5% vs. 57.0%, all p < 0.05). Overall, 56.5% were qualified for T-TEER, with no significant difference between CIED and non-CIED groups (54.0% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.487). Among CIED patients, 37 (32.7%) had CIED-related TR, characterized by more severe TR (EROA 0.90 vs. 0.60 cm{superscript 2}, p = 0.017) but similar qualification rates (59.5% vs. 52.7%, p = 0.500). ConclusionsCIED carriers with severe TR represent a more complex and symptomatic population, yet the presence of a CIED does not affect eligibility for T-TEER. The high prevalence of CIED-related TR underscores the growing clinical relevance of this condition and highlights the need for prospective multicenter studies to refine patient selection and treatment strategies.

Published in Polish Archives of Internal Medicine · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.