Back

Outcomes and Optimization of Two Reading Training Protocols for Individuals with Homonymous Visual Field Defects

Tol, S.; Heutink, J.; Veldman, E. J.; Koopman, J.; Vermeer, J. M.; Buijnink, V.; de Haan, G. A.

2025-11-06 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.11.03.25339232 medRxiv
Show abstract

Individuals with Homonymous Visual Field Defects (HVFDs) after brain injury often experience difficulty in reading. This can be debilitating, as reading is an important aspect of daily life. The current study aims to explore the potential outcomes of two reading trainings for individuals with HVFDs. One training, the Vistra reading training, aims at compensating for the HVFD by practicing adjusted reading eye movements. The second training is the Rotated Reading training, which aims to utilize the intact visual field by practicing to read rotated text in a personalized angle. Next to assessing the potential outcomes of the Vistra and Rotated Reading trainings on a group and individual level, this study aims to investigate patient experiences with the trainings. Using a Partially Randomized Patient Preferred Controlled Trial, participants were assigned to one of three groups: Vistra, Rotated Reading or a waiting list control group. There were 5 participants included in both the Vistra and Rotated Reading groups, and 10 in the control group. Assessments were conducted before(T1), after(T2) and 3 months after(T3) training or the waiting period, including reading speed, self-reported reading efficacy, attitude, skills, and objects, and quality of life. Results showed significant group-level improvements following Vistra training on reading speed, self-reported reading skills and reading objects. Furthermore, within some Vistra participants, significant individual changes were observed on reading speed, self-reported reading efficacy, reading objects and quality of life. No significant group effects were found for Rotated Reading training, but some individuals demonstrated significant individual changes on self-reported reading efficacy and reading skills. Qualitative analysis identified five key themes of reading training outcome: reading objects, reading skills, reading enjoyment, reading certainty and non-reading related outcomes. Participants reported adopting specific reading strategies and emphasized perceived improvement as a key motivator for continued use. Feedback highlighted the wish for personalized training approaches.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
42.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
3
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
7
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
9
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
10
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
11
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
15
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%