Understanding Patient Perceptions of Genetic Testing to Predict Type 2 Diabetes Risk After Gestational Diabetes
Patel, R.; Christodoulou, M.; Taylor, Z.; Shetty, P.; Zollner, J.
Show abstract
AimsWomen with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) face increased lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Genetic risk-predictive testing could help identify those at highest risk and guide preventative care. We aimed to assess perceptions of genetic risk scores to help inform future implementation. MethodsAn online survey of 112 women with current or prior GDM assessed willingness for genetic and non-genetic risk testing, attitudes lifestyle motivation, and data-use concerns. Quantitative analyses were complemented by thematic analysis of free-text responses. ResultsOverall, willingness was high for both genetic testing (83.9%) and non- genetic (90.2%), with no significant difference between them (p = 0.083). Participants identifying as White reported greater willingness for genetic testing (p = 0.020) and stronger agreement that testing should be available on the NHS (p = 0.032) than N=non-White participants. Attitudes toward genetic testing were positive and associated with both willingness to test and support for NHS availability (p < 0.001). Younger participants were more motivated to modify lifestyle behaviours (p = 0.015). Overall, concerns around data collection were low; although free-text responses highlighted health insurance implications, psychological burden, actionability of results, and timing of testing as salient themes. ConclusionsWomen with GDM were receptive to genetic risk-prediction for T2DM, with low concerns around data usage. Demographic differences in acceptability and motivation highlight the need for inclusive, targeted communications and lifestyle support alongside integration testing into postnatal-GDM care. What is already known?We know that women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) have an increased risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) later in life. Genetic risk scores can stratify women by their likelihood of developing T2DM following GDM. This risk information could help to inform womens lifestyle choices and help prevent progression to T2DM. However, evidence is limited regarding womens willingness to undergo genetic testing, how risk information might shape lifestyle behaviours, and their concerns about data collection and privacy. What this study has found?Our study found that our participants with current or previous GDM were fairly receptive to genetic testing to predict their future risk of T2DM. There was no significant difference between reported acceptability of a non-genetic test and a genetic test. Participants held positive attitudes towards genetic testing and fairly low concerns about data use and privacy. However, the acceptability of this testing and motivation for lifestyle changes varied by participant demographics (including age, education and ethnicity). Additionally, free-text responses identified concerns over implications for health insurance, the timing of testing, psychological burden of knowing results and the actionability of results. What are the implications of the study?To support equitable engagement and uptake of genetic risk-prediction testing, inclusive education and communication strategies are needed - particularly on the actionability of results and data collection/storage policies. Although not directly measured, our findings point to the value of culturally responsive, trust-building communication--delivered with cultural humility and empathy--to address uncertainties and enable informed choice. These findings support the use of genetic predictive testing within postnatal GDM care in addition to targeted interventions to support lifestyle changes and prevent progression to type 2 diabetes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional questionnaire study: impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia remains prevalent in adults with type 1 diabetes and is associated with the risk of severe hypoglycaemia 94%
- Feedback of Individual Genetic and Genomics Research Results: A Qualitative Study Involving Grassroots Communities in Uganda 94%
- Michigan men’s diabetes project II: protocol for peer-led diabetes self-management education and long-term support in Black men 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring support needs of people living with diabetes during the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a UK survey 96%
- The use of a participatory patient engagement research project to meaningfully engage those with lived experience of diabetes and homelessness 94%
- Insulin pricing and other major diabetes-related concerns in the USA: A study of 46,407 Tweets between 2017 and 2019 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “One more tool in the tool belt”: A qualitative interview study investigating patient and clinician opinions on the integration of psychometrics into routine testing for disorders of gut-brain interaction 91%
- Using the Mercy Method to Estimate Ideal Body Weight in Children. A Description and Validation of a New Methodology 89%
- The effect of alpha-cyclodextrin on post-prandial glucose excursions, a systematic meta analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 93%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 92%
- Women’s views on accepting COVID-19 vaccination during and after pregnancy, and for their babies: A multi-methods study in the UK 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determining the feasibility of calculating pancreatic cancer risk scores for people with new-onset diabetes in primary care (DEFEND PRIME): study protocol 94%
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study for the assessment of sarcopenia in gestational diabetes: The SiGnal-D study 93%
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.