Back

Feasibility of following a fasting-mimicking diet programme in persons with type 2 diabetes - a mixed-methods study

Schoonakker, M. P.; van den Burg, E. L.; Sturm, C. A.; Lamb, H. J. L.; Numans, M. E.; Pijl, H.; Adriaanse, M. A.; van Peet, P. G.

2025-11-02 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.10.30.25339142
Show abstract

Background & AimsA fasting-mimicking programme in primary care demonstrated metabolic benefits for persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study evaluated the feasibility of this approach. MethodsPersons with T2D who used metformin or no medication for glycemic control, were randomly assigned to monthly 5-day fasting-mimicking diet (FMD) cycles plus usual care (n=51) or usual care alone (n=49) for one year. In this mixed method study, feasibility of following an FMD was evaluated by combining quantitative data, including reasons for discontinuation, serum ketone levels, and treatment satisfaction, and qualitative data from focus group discussions. ResultsIn the FMD group, 61% of the participants completed the FMD programme, 31% discontinued the programme due to diet-related issues, and 8% discontinued the programme for other reasons. Ketone levels were consistently higher in the FMD group than in the control group (p<0.01). Treatment satisfaction did not differ between the groups. Focus groups (n=20) revealed facilitators of adherence, including convenience, short FMD cycles, not feeling hungry, internal motivation, believing in beneficial effects, experiencing health effects and social support. Barriers included taste, quantity, and frequency of the FMD, environmental temptations, and lack of social support. ConclusionsThe implementation of periodic FMD cycles appears feasible for T2D patients in primary care, supported by adherence rates, ketone levels, and treatment satisfaction. Adherence might be enhanced by addressing identified facilitators and barriers. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03811587. Registered 22 January 2019.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
21.5%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 5%
16.8%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 54%
8.3%
4
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 1%
3.2%
6
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 0.9%
3.1%
8
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
2.5%
10
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 7%
2.5%
11
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 1.0%
2.0%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
13
BJGP Open
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
14
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 19%
1.4%
15
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 74%
1.4%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 17%
1.3%
17
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
18
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 6%
0.9%
19
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 20%
0.9%
20
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Obesity
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
European Journal of Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.7%