In-home validation of wrist- and waist-worn devices against portable electroencephalography for sleep assessment in older adults
Deguchi, N.; Hatanaka, S.; Daimaru, K.; Wakui, T.; Fujihara, S.; Imamura, K.; Kawai, H.; Maruo, K.; Sasai, H.
Show abstract
Sleep health is essential for older adults. However, validity of wrist- and waist-worn devices for assessing sleep under free-living conditions remains unclear. This study evaluated the accuracy of a wrist-worn smartwatch (Silmee W22) and a waist-worn activity monitor (MTN-221) in measuring key sleep parameters, using portable electroencephalography (EEG; Insomnograf K2) as the reference. Healthy older adults wore all devices simultaneously for at least three nights. Total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency were analyzed using Bland- Altman plots, multilevel models, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Fifty-five participants completed the study, yielding valid EEG-paired data for 49 participants with Silmee W22 (238 nights) and 53 with MTN-221 (265 nights). Silmee W22 overestimated total sleep time by 35 min and sleep efficiency by 8.1%, whereas MTN-221 overestimated it by 3 min and sleep efficiency by 1.0%. Both devices underestimated sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset, with greater discrepancies observed as the estimated values increased. ICCs for total sleep time were 0.60-0.75 for Silmee W22 and 0.66-0.79 for MTN-221, while agreement for sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset remained lower. While Silmee W22 did not provide sufficiently accurate estimates of total sleep time, MTN-221 yielded estimates that may offer practical benefits for large-scale sleep monitoring in older adults. In both devices, estimates of sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency should be interpreted with caution due to misclassification of quiet wakefulness. Further algorithm refinement is warranted.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Memory via Automated Targeted Memory Reactivation during Sleep 95%
- Subjective sleep onset latency is influenced by sleep structure and body heat loss in human subjects 94%
- Two years after lockdown: longitudinal trajectories of sleep disturbances and mental health over the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of age, gender, and chronotype 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliable Contactless Monitoring of Heart Rate, Breathing Rate and Breathing Disturbance During Sleep in Aging: A Digital Health Technology Evaluation Study 96%
- Comparison of accelerometry-based measures of physical activity 92%
- The Mezurio smartphone application: Evaluating the feasibility of frequent digital cognitive assessment in the PREVENT dementia study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of an Electroencephalography-Measuring Headband or Actigraphy Compared with Polysomnography in Older Adults with Sleep Disturbances 97%
- Evaluation of Dreem headband for sleep staging and EEG spectral analysis in people living with Alzheimer’s and older adults 97%
- Changes of evening exposure to electronic devices during the COVID-19 lockdown affect the time course of sleep disturbances 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age is Associated with Dampened Circadian Patterns of Rest and Activity: The Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) 93%
- Associations and Interaction Effects of Socioeconomic, Lifestyle, and Genetic Factors on Intrinsic Capacity 92%
- The bispectral EEG (BSEEG) method quantifies post-operative delirium-like states in young and aged mice after head mount implantation surgery 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults: Evidence from three empirical studies 93%
- Topographical relocation of adolescent sleep spindles reveals a new maturational pattern of the human brain 93%
- Satisfaction with Life in relation to Sleep Health among a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Adults 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.