Back

Understanding Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation Among U.S. Women: A National Survey Study

Fida, D.; Rajasekera, T. A.; Roy, A.; Wilson, J. C.; Wiley, A.; Lederman, R.; Spagnolo, P. A.

2025-10-28 public and global health
10.1101/2025.10.28.25337741 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the persistent underrepresentation of women--particularly those from racially and ethnically minoritized groups--in clinical research, little is known about their perspectives on participation. This study examined healthcare experiences, access, and attitudes toward clinical trials among U.S. women and assessed how race, socioeconomic status, and healthcare access intersect to shape willingness to participate (WTP). We conducted a national cross-sectional online survey (January-March 2023) of 5,301 women aged 18-70 years. The 81-item questionnaire assessed demographics, health status, healthcare access, and clinical trial experiences. Among 4,987 respondents reporting race (77% White, 14% Black, 7% Asian, 2% Other), nearly 80% expressed interest in participating in clinical trials, yet only 11% had been invited and 7% had enrolled. In adjusted models, WTP was lower among Black ({beta} = -0.06; P = .04) and Asian ({beta} = -0.09; P = .01) women than among White women, whereas higher educational attainment and multimorbidity predicted greater WTP. Altruism, clear study explanations, and financial compensation were key motivators, while time burden and concerns about side effects were major barriers, with the salience of these factors varying by race. Most respondents (88%) endorsed the importance of womens inclusion and sex-specific reporting, though neutrality on these issues was more frequent among racially minoritized women. Despite high interest, structural and informational barriers continue to constrain womens engagement in clinical research, underscoring the need for trust-building, burden-reducing, and culturally responsive strategies to promote equitable participation and improve representation across racial groups.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.6%
4
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
6
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
7
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
9
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
11
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
15
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%