Back

No evidence for a causal link between plasma lipids and multiple sclerosis susceptibility and severity: a Mendelian randomisation study

Nagrodzki, J.; Proitsi, P.; Tan, M.; Dobson, R.; Jacobs, B. M.

2025-10-28 neurology
10.1101/2025.10.27.25338893 medRxiv
Show abstract

Observational studies suggest that alterations in circulating lipid levels may be associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) susceptibility and severity. Our study employs two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate whether these relationships are causal. Genetic instruments for 249 metabolites, predominantly lipids and lipoproteins, were obtained from a combined dataset of European-ancestry individuals from the UK and Estonian Biobanks. Outcome data were obtained from the International MS Genetics Consortium GWAS studies of MS susceptibility and severity. MR analyses considered MS susceptibility and severity as distinct outcomes and utilized the inverse variance-weighted multiplicative random-effects method in the main analysis. No metabolic exposures demonstrated statistically significant evidence of a causal relationship with MS susceptibility. For MS severity, two traits showed suggestive associations - triglycerides in very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) ({beta} = -0.101, SE = 0.028, p = 3.9 x 10-4) and triglycerides in chylomicrons and extremely large VLDL ({beta} = -0.104, SE = 0.032, p = 1.2 x 10-3). The MR-Egger intercept suggested that these observations may be driven by horizontal pleiotropy. Sensitivity analysis with multivariable MR using Body Mass Index as a possible confounder demonstrated substantial attenuation of instrument strength once genetic overlap with BMI was taken into account. In this study we found no convincing evidence that circulating lipids or lipid-related metabolites exert a causal influence on susceptibility to, or severity of, multiple sclerosis. The nominally statistically significant result is likely a result of horizontal pleiotropy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.7%
3
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
4
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.0%
7
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
8
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
9
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
11
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
17
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
19
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%