Back

Benefits of hydrogen-rich jelly during constant load testing in healthy adults: A pilot double-blind randomized crossover trial

Muramoto, Y.; Toshima, G.; Minaguchi, E.; Sugai, K.; Iwasawa, Y.; Shirakawa, K.; Nagashima, K.; Sato, Y.; Sano, M.; Sato, K.; KATSUMATA, Y.

2025-10-28 sports medicine
10.1101/2025.10.26.25338854 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeExercise-induced fatigue hinders activity. Molecular hydrogen may enhance mitochondrial function and efficiency, but its effects in non-athletes are unclear. We evaluated whether hydrogen-rich jelly (HRJ) enhances high-intensity exercise in non-athletes. MethodsThis double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial (UMIN000053818) enrolled 50 healthy adults, who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to ingest HRJ first or placebo jelly (PJ) first. Participants consumed 10 g of HRJ or PJ on three occasions: 24 h, 90 min, and immediately before exercise. An incremental test determined anaerobic threshold (AT), followed by 30 min of cycling at 120% of AT. Oxygen consumption (VO{square}) and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored; blood lactate was sampled every 5 min. Condition differences were assessed with paired t-tests and mixed-effects models. ResultsOf the 50 participants, 48 completed all measurements, and analyses were restricted to the 28 who completed the entire 30-min exercise session (13 women, 46.4%). The mean age was 41.7 {+/-} 11.5 years; mean BMI 22.3 {+/-} 2.6 kg/m{superscript 2}; and mean peak VO{square}, 26.8 {+/-} 5.9 mL/kg/min. In the PJ condition, maximum lactate reached 5.12 mmol/L. Compared with PJ, HRJ resulted in significantly lower lactate levels at 5 and 10 min, as well as a lower peak lactate (mean difference -0.75, p = 0.014). VO{square} at 10 and 30 min and peak VO{square} were also lower with HRJ (peak difference -1.17, p = 0.017). HR showed no significant difference between conditions. ConclusionHRJ reduced peak blood lactate and VO{square}, suggesting suppressed metabolite accumulation and improved exercise efficiency.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.