Back

TranslAGE: A Comprehensive Platform for Systematic Validation of Epigenetic Aging Biomarkers

Borrus, D. S.; Sehgal, R.; Armstrong, J. F.; Gonzalez, J. T.; Zou, G.; Kasamoto, J.; Markov, Y.; Lasky-Su, J.; Higgins-Chen, A.

2025-10-19 genomics
10.1101/2025.10.16.682960 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epigenetic clocks are powerful biomarkers of biological aging, however, their performance varies across studies and contexts. Current limitations include siloed datasets, inconsistent validation methods, and the absence of a standardized framework for systematic comparison. Here, we introduce TranslAGE: a publicly available online resource that addresses this gap by harmonizing 179 human blood DNA methylation datasets and precalculating a suite of 41 epigenetic biomarker scores for each of the >42,000 total samples. Users can explore these data through interactive dashboards that evaluate four fundamental performance domains: Stability, Treatment response, Associations, and Risk, collectively forming the STAR framework. Stability quantifies robustness to multiple types of technical and biological noise. Treatment response measures biomarker sensitivity to aging interventions and environmental exposures. Associations capture cross-sectional relationships with age, demographics, disease, and other phenotypes, and Risk assesses predictive power for future functional decline, morbidity and mortality. The STAR framework unifies these test metrics into a single composite scoring system that enables researchers to identify, benchmark, and validate biomarkers best suited to their scientific or clinical applications. TranslAGE will be continually updated, with rapid scaling by adding datasets, biomarkers, or analyses. By providing harmonized datasets, precomputed biomarker scores, and interactive data tools, TranslAGE establishes the first standardized, reproducible framework for benchmarking epigenetic aging biomarkers across populations, and accelerates the translation toward clinical use.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.7%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
5
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.1%
7
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
13
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
16
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
21
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
27
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%