Finding the Goldilocks zone for toddler accelerometry: how many days are needed for a reliable estimate of physical activity using machine learning?
Letts, E.; da Silva, S. M.; King-Dowling, S.; Di Cristofaro, N.; Obeid, J.
Show abstract
Accelerometers are used to measure sedentary time (SED) and physical activity (PA) in toddlers, but they may struggle to wear them for extended periods of time (e.g., weeks). Previous studies have investigated the minimum number of days needed to reliably estimate SED and PA using count-based methods. Machine learning (ML) methods use raw data which is more variable, thus potentially requiring more days for a reliable estimate. The objective of this study is to understand how many days and hours per day of accelerometer wear are needed for a reliable estimation of SED and PA using ML. Methods109 toddlers wore an accelerometer on the right hip at home for 7 days. Time in SED, light PA (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and total PA (TPA) were assessed using a validated ML model for toddlers. Single day intraclass coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for each minimum hours per day of wear time and each outcome. These ICCs were passed to the Spearman-Brown prophecy equation to determine the reliability of each hour per day and days combination (3-12 hours, 1-10 days). ResultsPredicted reliabilities ranged from 0.32 to 0.98, increasing as both numbers of hours per day and number of days increased. DiscussionOur findings support the recommended 6 hours per day of wear for at least 4 days as it balances acceptable reliability with participant retention. This recommendation is valid for ML methods and we anticipate that it can be used to further explore SED and PA in toddlers using ML advances. Key HighlightsO_LIThis study calculates reliability of estimates of toddlers physical activity and sedentary time using machine learning method for a range of days (1-10) and hours per day (3-12). C_LIO_LIOur findings support the recommended 6 hours per day of wear for at least 4 days as it balances acceptable reliability with participant retention. C_LIO_LIWe hope that this recommendation can be used to further explore physical activity and sedentary time in toddlers using machine learning advances. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Behaviour-based movement cut-off points in 3-year old children comparing wrist- with hip-worn actigraphs MW8 and GT3X 95%
- How many days are needed to estimate accelerometry-assessed physical activity during pregnancy? Methodological analyses based on a cohort study using wrist-worn accelerometer 94%
- Physical determinants of daily physical activity in older men and women 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physical activity, aerobic fitness and brain white matter: their role for executive functions in adolescence 91%
- Evaluating a Novel High-Density EEG Sensor Net Structure for Improving Inclusivity in Infants with Curly or Tightly Coiled Hair 89%
- Negative Impact of Daily Screen Use on Inhibitory Control Network in Preadolescence: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Covid-19 lockdown: Ethnic differences in children’s self-reported physical activity and the importance of leaving the home environment. A longitudinal and cross-sectional 92%
- New job, new habits? A Multilevel Interrupted Time Series analysis of diet, physical activity and sleep changes among young adults starting work for the first time 90%
- Physical activity in adolescence: cross-national comparisons of levels, distributions and disparities across 52 countries 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of accelerometry-based measures of physical activity 95%
- A Neural Network Based Algorithm for Dynamically Adjusting Activity Targets to Sustain Exercise Engagement Among People Using Activity Trackers 90%
- Improving Heart disease risk through quality-focused diet logging: pre-post study of a diet quality tracking app 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 91%
- ASAP: An automatic sustained attention prediction method for infants and toddlers using wearable device signals 90%
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.