Back

Timing matters: Unveiling the distinct effects of early vs late onset pre-eclampsia on mothers and newborns in a tertiary hospital in Bangladesh

Tanjim, T.; Badrul Haider, A. S. M.; Hossain, H.; Zeba, D.

2025-10-17 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2025.10.15.25337483 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPre-eclampsia (PE) is a significant cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. The clinical course and severity of PE can vary depending on the gestational age at onset. However, limited data from developing countries including Bangladesh stratify outcomes by onset timing, hindering context-specific management. This study aimed to differentiate maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with early-onset PE (EO-PE, <34 weeks) versus late-onset PE (LO-PE, [&ge;]34 weeks) in a tertiary care setting in Bangladesh. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at Faridpur Medical College Hospital, Faridpur, Bangladesh, from March to August 2023. Data were collected from hospital records and through pre-structured telephone questionnaires for 255 mothers diagnosed with PE (EO-PE: n=121; LO-PE: n=134). Maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the EO-PE and LO-PE groups. ResultsThe prevalence of PE was 11.28%. EO-PE was associated with more adverse perinatal outcomes compared to LO-PE, including higher rates of prematurity, low birth weight, and increased need for neonatal hospital admission. Maternal complications such as eclampsia (31% vs 19%) and placental abruption (20% vs 10%) were more frequent in the EO-PE group. In multivariable regression, EO-PE was not independently associated with maternal adverse outcomes but showed significantly higher odds of stillbirth (aOR: 17.7, 95% CI: 6.15-66.7, p<0.001) and neonatal adverse outcomes (aOR: 5.33, 95% CI: 2.96-9.83, p<0.001). ConclusionsEarly-onset PE is associated with more severe adverse perinatal outcomes compared to late-onset PE. Onset-based classification, early screening, and targeted management strategies are recommended to reduce the burden of pre-eclampsia.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
20
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%