Apnea Test for Brain-Death Determination: A Seven-Years Retrospective Study in a French University Hospital
Hirsinger, B.; Martin Lefevre, L.; Lakhal, K.; Bourdiol, A.; Lepoivre, T.; Delahaye, M.; Canet, E.; Lascarrou, J. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe apnea test is essential for the diagnosis of death by neurologic criteria but clinical data are scarce. Research QuestionHow often and why apnea testing was not done or was aborted, how often the apnea test was completed, and the results of aborted and completed tests (positive/negative/inconclusive). Study Design and MethodsThis retrospective observational cohort study enrolled patients screened for death by neurologic criteria in four intensive care units at a French university hospital in 2015-2022. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients in whom the apnea test was not done due to safety concerns, the proportion of tested patients in whom the test was aborted because of adverse events, completed tests, and the results of tests. Adverse events were described. We measured arterial pH, PaO2, and PaCO2 at the start and end of each test. In patients with multiple tests, only the first was considered for the study. ResultsOf 371 patients screened for death by neurologic criteria, 52 (14%) did not undergo apnea testing, mainly because of respiratory or hemodynamic instability. Among all apnea tests, 94% were positive, 2% negative, and 4% inconclusive. The test was aborted in 34 (11%) patients due to adverse events, of which the most common was hypoxemia; five other severe adverse events were recorded. Test duration varied substantially even when considering only completed tests. The proportion of patients who became donors was not significantly different across the groups with completed tests, aborted tests, or no test. InterpretationOur data confirm that in most cases, the apnea test is conducted, completed and generally safe for diagnosing death by neurologic criteria. However, further research is needed to identify risk factors for adverse events during testing, contraindications to testing, and the optimal protocol for conducting the apnea test according to the characteristics of each patient.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SpO 2 /FiO 2 Ratio as a Better Metric for Assessment of RBC Transfusion Effectiveness in Non-traumatic Critically Ill Patients with Physiologic Derangements 93%
- Admission criteria in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a physiology-based approach 93%
- Altered kinetics of circulating progenitor cells in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) associated vasoplegic patients: A pilot study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
- Cardiovascular disease and severe hypoxemia associated with higher rates of non-invasive respiratory support failure in COVID-19 91%
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome and shunt detection with bubble studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prone positioning of non-intubated patients with COVID-19 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 92%
- ICU and ventilator mortality among critically ill adults with COVID-19 90%
- Immune profiling demonstrates a common immune signature of delayed acquired immunodeficiency in patients with various etiologies of severe injury 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 91%
- Centhaquine Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Patients with Hypovolemic Shock 91%
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma therapy against standard therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 disease 94%
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 92%
- AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc): Developing an Interpretable Clinical Score for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.