Timing of the fourth dose of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in perennial settings: a modelling study
Figueroa-Downing, D.; Kelly, S. L.; Cavelan, A.; Penny, M. A.; Malinga, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe recommendation of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine for use in children in moderate to high transmission areas by the WHO in 2021 provided another crucial tool in reducing malaria morbidity and mortality. As countries introduce the RTS,S vaccine, there is an interest in exploring vaccination schedules that align with existing routine health touch points and to optimize vaccine coverage. MethodsThis study used OpenMalaria, an individual-based, stochastic model of malaria transmission and disease progression, to assess the impact of different vaccination timing schedules and coverage on uncomplicated malaria cases, severe malaria cases, and malaria-related deaths across different archetypal transmission settings. We ran simulations comparing fourth dose protection against infection and timings at six-, nine-, 12-, 15- and 18-month intervals following the primary series, including exploring ranges of plausible protection assumptions for many of the dose timings. ResultsThe primary series substantially reduces the malaria burden across transmission settings, regardless of timing of the fourth dose. While the number of cases averted varies by baseline prevalence, our modelling suggests that the primary series is responsible for around 54-93% of the total clinical and severe cases averted across transmission archetypes in perennial settings. Additionally, a fourth dose of the vaccine could avert additional 9-46% malaria cases and 7-41% severe cases in addition to the primary series alone. We find potential flexibility in timing this dose, especially when focused on 6 to 12 months following the primary series. ConclusionsIn addition to the primary series, use of a fourth dose of the RTS,S vaccine can be tailored to country specific context and linked to existing health touch points to ensure adequate coverage of this dose. In particular, a fourth dose delivered between 15- and 21-months of age with high population coverage will likely avert the largest proportion of cases of clinical malaria, severe malaria, and deaths in perennial settings, across transmission intensities. Trial registrationN/A
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Infant and Neonatal Rotavirus Vaccination Schedules in Malawi 95%
- Rural prioritization may increase the impact of COVID-19 vaccines in Sub-Saharan Africa due to ongoing internal migration: A modeling study 94%
- Model-informed target product profiles of long acting-injectables for use as seasonal malaria prevention 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public health impact of catch-up vaccination or additional booster doses with pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine R21/Matrix-M: a modelling study 96%
- Potential health and economic impact of paediatric vaccination using next generation influenza vaccines in Kenya: a modelling study 95%
- Global impact and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedules: a comparative modelling analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projected health impact of post-discharge malaria chemoprevention among children with severe malarial anaemia in Africa 94%
- Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in South Africa 94%
- Preventing antimalarial drug resistance with triple artemisinin-based combination therapies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projecting the impact of a two-dose COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Ontario, Canada 94%
- Predicting immune protection against outcomes of infectious disease from population-level effectiveness data with application to COVID-19 93%
- Expected endpoints from future chikungunya vaccine trial sites informed by serological data and modeling 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.