Back

Adaptive disorder as the hallmark of nanobodies antigen-binding loops

Bagordo, D.; Treves, G.; Santorsola, M.; Colombo, G.; Lescai, F.

2025-10-10 immunology
10.1101/2025.10.10.681624 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nanobodies are antigen-binding proteins of great interest as diagnostics and therapeutics. Accurate and fast characterization of their complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) is crucial to uncover the principles guiding their design. Yet, this task remains challenging, as random recombination and somatic mutations generate highly diverse CDR sequences that escape motif-based or structure-prediction approaches currently used to identify them. To overcome this hurdle, we employed two independent strategies that converged on the same conclusion. At the sequence level, we developed a deep learning model to identify nanobody CDRs directly from the primary sequence. At the structural level, we applied an energy decomposition method, revealing CDRs as residues highly uncoupled to the rest of the fold. Explainability analyses showed the network captured intrinsic CDR properties, which notably aligned with these energy values. CDRs emerge as fuzzy regions capable of adopting diverse conformational ensembles, from which a preferred state is selected upon antigen binding. This finding supports a model where chaos in both sequence and structure appears adaptive and disorder emerges as the hallmark of nanobody CDRs. This work aims to advance the definition of rules for the design of antigen binding regions, paving the way for the next-generation immune diagnostics and therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.9%
2
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
9
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
12
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
21
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%