Back

Age-adjusted mortality from systolic heart failure (HFrEF) is almost double that of diastolic heart failure (HFpEF) over recent years, with significant racial disparity.

Movahed, M. R.; Feerst, H.; Hashemzadeh, M.

2025-10-10 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.10.08.25337632
Show abstract

BackgroundHeart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Systolic heart failure (SHF; HFrEF) used to be considered as more lethal than diastolic heart failure (DHF; HFpEF). This study evaluates national age-adjusted mortality trends for SHF and DHF from 2016 to 2020, with particular attention to sex- and race-based differences. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of adults [≥]20 years hospitalized with SHF or DHF in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020. Age-adjusted mortality rates per 100,000 population were calculated using direct standardization to the 2000 U.S. standard population. Trends were stratified by sex and race to identify demographic disparities. ResultsWe identified 7.36 million SHF and 10.06 million DHF hospitalizations between 2016 and 2020. SHF maintained higher absolute mortality throughout the study, almost double that of diastolic heart failure (250.4 to 328.6 per 100,000; +31.2%), but DHF mortality rose more sharply in relative terms (164.1 to 225.8 per 100,000; +37.6%). From 2016-2019, mortality rates were relatively stable, but between 2019 and 2020, SHF mortality increased by 27.8% and DHF mortality by 33.5%. Minority populations experienced the steepest mortality surges, particularly Native American, Hispanic, and Black patients, narrowing their historical mortality gaps between SHF and DHF. Similarly, male DHF mortality increased disproportionately in 2020 (47.7% rise vs. 22.2% for females). ConclusionsDHF does represent the predominant heart failure phenotype in the United States in terms of hospitalization occurrences, and shows a faster growth trajectory in mortality relative to SHF. Importantly, however, SHF remains more lethal in absolute terms and has not come close to being surpassed by DHF despite a sharp rise in DHF mortality during 2020.

Matching journals

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
2
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
#1
173× avg
3
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 0.7%
37× avg
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.5%
46× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 58%
7.6%
6
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 1%
26× avg
7
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.4%
35× avg
8
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.7%
43× avg
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.1%
54× avg
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 3%
8.2× avg
11
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
12
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
19× avg
13
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
14
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
9.3× avg
15
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 78%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 13%
2.1× avg
17
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 4%
5.2× avg
18
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 3%
9.6× avg
19
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 53%
0.7%
20
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
4.3× avg