Registration and reporting characteristics of trials investigating exercise therapy following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.
Groenfeldt, B. M.; Husted, R. S.; Broedsgaard, R. H.; Holst, L.; Kallemose, T.; Chapple, C.; Juhl, C. B.; Bandholm, T.
Show abstract
ObjectivesProspectively registering the primary trial outcome is important to reduce selective outcome reporting and increase trustworthiness of findings used to guide clinical practice. The objective of this systematic review was to explore and compare the reporting characteristics of prospectively and non-prospectively registered trials investigating exercise therapy following total knee arthroplasty. DesignTrials comparing effects of exercise therapy after total knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis were sought in four databases from 2000 (clinicaltrials.gov launch) to 12th of August 2024. Randomised controlled trials comparing different exercise therapy interventions were included. Primary outcomes were extracted using a pre-specified hierarchy to reflect each trials most consistently reported outcome. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations Risk-of-Bias tool version 2. ResultsNinety-four trials (n = 9,396) were included: 13 prospectively registered, 33 retrospectively registered, and 48 unregistered. A single primary outcome was defined in 43.6% of trials. Four trials reported a primary outcome consistent with a prospective registration. Prospectively registered trials reported smaller effect estimates (SMD 0.06; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.16) than retrospectively registered (SMD 0.67; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.11) and unregistered trials (SMD 0.59; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.86), and more often defined a single primary outcome, reported sample size calculations, and followed intention-to-treat principles. ConclusionProspective registration and clear primary outcome definition were uncommon in trials comparing exercise therapy after total knee arthroplasty. Trials without these elements had larger effect size estimates at higher risk of bias, suggesting that registration status is an important indicator of methodological quality. Registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6WZRE Protocol and SAPhttps://osf.io/kwqcb/files/osfstorage
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trials that turn from retrospectively registered to prospectively registered: A cohort study of ‘retroactively prospective’ clinical trial registration using history data 95%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 94%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 96%
- Clinical Trials in COVID-19 Management & Prevention: A Meta-epidemiological Study examining methodological quality 96%
- Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries was often missing or delayed 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The devil is in the details: Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopedic clinical trials 98%
- Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews. Protocol for a systematic methodological review 97%
- Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of Acupuncture on Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction Following Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 95%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 95%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 93%
- The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.