Back

Effect of a Dietary Intervention on Weight Loss in Adults with High vs Low Genetic Predisposition to Higher BMI: A Randomized Diet Intervention Trial

Rodosthenous, R. S.; Viiri, L. E.; Carson, A.; Cajuso, T.; Corbetta, A.; Jones, S.; Brenna, E.; Makkonen, E.; Virolainen, M.; Korkeala, N.; Widen, E.; Ripatti, S.; Ganna, A.

2025-10-07 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.10.06.25337395 medRxiv
Show abstract

It is unclear whether the effectiveness of weight loss interventions differs based on genetic predisposition to higher body mass index (BMI). Genome-wide polygenic scores (PS) for BMI are the strongest genetic predictors of elevated body weight, but no prospective trials have evaluated weight loss responses based on BMI PS. To assess whether adults with high or low genetic predisposition to higher BMI experience differential weight loss during a 6-month dietary intervention, we designed the GENEROOS study, a single-site, randomised controlled trial conducted in Finland from October 2023 to November 2024. Participants (N=223), aged 30-65 years, with a BMI of 23-36 kg/m{superscript 2} and no diabetes, were recruited from 38,621 genotyped individuals in the Finnish Clinical Biobank Tampere. They were selected from the top or bottom 5th percentile of the BMI PS distribution and randomized to either a six-month dietary coaching program aimed at a 500 kcal/day energy deficit or to a control group receiving no dietary intervention. The main outcome was change in body weight (%) from baseline to 6 months and the interaction between BMI PS and intervention status. At baseline, those in the top 5% of BMI PS weighed on average 8.4 kg (95% CI, 5.1 to 11.7 kg) more than those in the bottom 5%. In the intervention group, mean weight change at 2, 4, and 6 months was -3.89%, -5.32%, and -4.70%; in the control group it was -1.10%, -0.85%, and 0.14%, respectively. No significant interaction was found between BMI PS and intervention on weight change ({beta} = 0.06 [95% CI, -1.33 to 1.44]; P = .94). In this randomised trial, genetic predisposition as measured by BMI PS did not modify response to dietary intervention, indicating that leveraging polygenic scores may not enhance the effectiveness of personalized weight loss strategies. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06092372

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
4
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
5
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
15
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%