Back

Oxidative Stress in two pollinators from Different Landscapes based on different pesticide residue profiles

Briscoe, K.; Byarlay, M.; Johnson, R. M.; Rehan, S.; Li-Byarlay, H.

2025-10-06 physiology
10.1101/2025.10.04.680455 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oxidative stress (OX) is a state of imbalance between antioxidants and reactive oxygen species, which are the byproducts of oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria. Different landscapes: conventional, organic, and roadside use different pesticides and pest control management practices pest control. The roadside landscape is a control for minimum application of herbicides and management. Two important pollinators, honey bees (Apis mellifera) and small carpenter bees (Ceratina calcarata) are studied here for their abiotic stress from different landscape. It is unknown whether the differences in these landscapes affect the oxidative stress of these two pollinators. Conventional farms offer the most exposure to pesticides, which have been related to increased stress levels. We hypothesized that honey bees and small carpenter bees (SCB) from conventional farms would experience the highest levels of OX. Results from the lipid assay indicated that honey bees and SCB of organic and roadside landscapes experienced the lowest and highest OX levels. The results of the protein carbonyl assay indicated a significant difference found between conventional and organic bees (p < 0.05), based on Tukeys post-hoc test. Previous research has shown that feral bees have a tolerance to high stress levels. The same could be true of honey bees and SCB from roadside landscapes, where the conditions imitate natural habitats. Organic farms use naturally derived pesticides and moderate management practices, likely contributing to their lower levels. Examining how these pollinators are affected by different farm landscapes can reveal the benefits and detriments of their corresponding management practices. This will lead to streamlined practices that are healthier for pollinators.

Published in Physiological Entomology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.5%
2
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
4
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
7
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
9
Journal of Insect Physiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
10
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
11
Journal of Medical Entomology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
12
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
14
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
Insect Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
18
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
19
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%