Back

Feasibility of 24-hour physical behavior monitoring with thigh-worn accelerometers after childhood cancer. The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS) - Activity

Nigg, C.; Mohr, D.; Schindera, C.; Brack, E.; Kuehni, C. E.

2025-10-07 oncology
10.1101/2025.10.04.25337334 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundA healthy lifestyle, including sufficient physical activity, limited sedentary behavior, and adequate sleep (24-hour physical behaviors) can mitigate late effect risks for childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Most research on 24-hour physical behaviors has been questionnaire-based, while device-based assessment is lacking. Here, we assess the feasibility of 24-hour physical behavior monitoring using thigh-worn accelerometers in an age-diverse CCS population. MethodsSCCSS-Activity is nested in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS), a nation-wide questionnaire-based cohort study. As part of the 2024/2025 mailing, we asked participants if they are willing to participate in an accelerometer-based sub-study. Participants wore an activPAL4(R) accelerometer continuously for eight days. We investigated feasibility using the following indicators: recruitment rate, acceptability and suitability of contact procedures and measurement scheduling, accelerometer return and adherence, summary reports, and overall impression. We analyzed quantitative data descriptively and conducted semi-structured interviews with nine participants. ResultsOf 367 CCS returning the baseline questionnaire (median: 14 years [IQR: 10-21]; 50% female), 157 (43%) expressed interest in the accelerometer study, 100 were enrolled as of June 2025, and 90 wore and returned the accelerometer, with all except two containing valid data. Participants wore the device for a median of seven days (IQR 7-8). Interview results indicated high acceptability and minimal burden. ConclusionTwenty-four-hour physical behavior assessment using thigh-worn accelerometers is feasible and well accepted among pediatric, adolescent, and adult CCS. This holds promise for future research to better understand and intervene on physical behaviors and to understand their compositional impact on CCS health. HighlightsO_LIThigh-worn accelerometry is feasible to assess 24-hour physical behaviors in survivors C_LIO_LI43% of eligible survivors expressed interest in accelerometer participation C_LIO_LI98% of participants provided valid accelerometry data C_LIO_LIMailing-based recruitment and return procedures were effective and acceptable C_LIO_LISurvivors reported low burden and high acceptability of study participation C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.4%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
10
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
13
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
25
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%