Biomarkers in Hip Dysplasia: a Scoping Review
Malmvig, O. V.; Overgaard, S.; Laigaard, J. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundHip dysplasia is a congenital condition affecting around 5% of the population and is a major risk factor for secondary osteoarthritis and hip arthroplasty. While biomarkers have been widely studied in primary osteoarthritis, their role in hip dysplasia remains unclear. Understanding biomarker profiles in this patient population may aid in the development of preventive and non-surgical treatment strategies, as well as monitoring the effects of surgical interventions and physical activity. ObjectiveTo systematically map and summarize the current evidence on biomarkers in patients with hip dysplasia. MethodsThis scoping review will follow the PRISMA-ScR guideline. Eligible studies include interventional and observational studies published in peer-reviewed journals reporting biomarker data in patients with hip dysplasia. Animal studies, conference abstracts, and studies not reporting hip dysplasia data separately will be excluded. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL without study design or date restrictions, but limited to English-language publications. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data, which will be synthesized in tables and summarized narratively. DisseminationThe findings will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and may inform research on disease-modifying treatments and prevention of osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia. Study registrationThis protocol is uploaded to MedRxiv.org FundingThe review is investigator-initiated. Any costs in connection with the study will relate to the salary of the investigators and are provided by the department.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 85%
- A Systematic Examination of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Usage Guidelines for Scholarly Publishing in Medical Journals 84%
- A case-control study based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to evaluate the effects of human papilloma virus on bone health in women 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Skeletal dysplasia-causing TRPV4 mutations suppress the hypertrophic differentiation of human iPSC-derived chondrocytes 90%
- Cbfβ regulates Wnt/β-catenin, Hippo/Yap, and TGFβ signaling pathways in articular cartilage homeostasis and protects from ACLT surgery-induced osteoarthritis 90%
- The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intra- and inter-rater reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change of the handheld dynamometer in individuals with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis 91%
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 90%
- Osteoblast-osteoclast co-cultures: a systematic review and map of available literature 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping 90%
- Uncertainty extraction and verification for the Common Conditions Affecting the Hand and Wrist Priority Setting Partnership: A proposed methodology for Priority Setting Partnerships with the James Lind Alliance 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hip geometric parameters are associated with radiographic and clinical hip osteoarthritis: findings from a cross-sectional study in UK Biobank 93%
- A Modified Comprehensive Grading System for Murine Knee Osteoarthritis: Scoring the Whole Joint as an Organ 92%
- Limited roles of Piezo mechanosensing channels in articular cartilage development and osteoarthritis progression 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.