Back

Strategic Automated External Defibrillator Deployment Based on Geospatial Analysis of Historical Cardiac Arrest Locations

Heckard, E. J.; Chugh, H.; Hadduck, K.; McNally, B. F.; Sovari, A.; Jui, J.; Salvucci, A.; Reinier, K.; Chugh, S.

2025-10-07 emergency medicine
10.1101/2025.10.03.25337296 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe hypothesized that historical out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) event locations can inform deployment of automated external defibrillators (AEDs). MethodsConsecutive SCA events attended by EMS were ascertained prospectively in two identically designed community-based studies in California (Ventura County, SCA n=2,935) and Oregon (Multnomah County, SCA n=2,213). Clusters of [&ge;]3 historical SCA events within a 100-meter radius were plotted using geospatial analysis. Proposed AED locations were positioned within 200-meters of the clusters. An existing AED registry in Ventura County (n=998) with coordinates was also plotted. Distances between SCAs and proposed AEDs were calculated. ResultsIn Ventura County, 97 clusters of [&ge;]3 SCAs were identified, covering 22% (n=653) of total SCAs with 90 proposed AEDs assigned to the clusters. The mean distance between individual SCA events and the nearest AED was 99.7 (SD=53.1) meters, representing a bystander AED response time of 3.0 (SD=1.6) minutes. Proposed bystander AED response times were significantly shorter than actual EMS response times [mean difference: 3.1 (95% CI: 2.9-3.4), p<0.0001]. Similar results were observed in Multnomah County. Compared to the existing AED registry in Ventura County, 18.9% (n=17) of our 90 proposed AEDs were within 200 meters of an existing AED. Of total SCAs in Ventura County,11.4% (n=334) were within 200 meters of an existing AED. Conclusions16-22% of historical SCA events could potentially be covered by 78-90 AEDs. The remainder could be served by utilizing the standard EMS response. Outcomes studies that compare this geospatial event-localization strategy to current AED location strategies are warranted. Data Sharing statementThe entire deidentified dataset, data dictionary and analytic code for this investigation are available upon request, from the date of article publication by contacting Sumeet S. Chugh, MD, at sumeet.chugh@cshs.org.

Published in IJC Heart &amp; Vasculature · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.