Back

Genetic contribution to asthma informs acute chest syndrome pathophysiology and risk stratification

El Ahouel, S.; Bellegarde, V.; Da Silva Faria, S.; St-Laurent, T.; Lecluze, E.; Pham Hung d'Alexandry d'Orengiani, A.-L.; Galacteros, F.; Bartolucci, P.; Legault, M.-A.; Lettre, G.; Pincez, T.

2025-10-02 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.09.30.25336662 medRxiv
Show abstract

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is a severe complication of sickle cell disease (SCD), but we lack tool to identify patients at high risk of ACS. Epidemiological studies have found an association between asthma and ACS but whether this link is causal is unclear. We used polygenic score (PGS) to analyze whether the genetic susceptibility to asthma was associated with ACS and could be used to stratify the risk of ACS. We identified that a PGS for asthma (PGSasthma) was associated with ACS rate, but not ACS occurrence, in both the CSSCD and the GEN-MOD cohorts, independently of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) ({beta}=0.17, standard error=0.06, p=0.006). This effect was mainly found in patients with HbF <5%. Combining PGSasthma and HbF allowed to identify a population at high risk of ACS recurrence: individuals within the highest PGSasthma quintile and the lowest HbF quintile. Partitioned PGS suggested that lymphocytes were the main driver of the genetically mediated risk of ACS by asthma. Finally, we assessed asthma and ACS overall genetic correlation. We found that these two conditions only partially overlap distinct, suggesting that asthma is not the main determinant of genetic propensity to ACS. In sum, our result suggests that patients with high genetic propensity to asthma are prone to recurrent ACS if not protected by high HbF levels. Combining PGSasthma and HbF may allow identifying high risk patients for personalize ACS management. Apart from this population at high risk of ACS, additional genetic determinants independent from asthma contribute to ACS.

Published in American Journal of Hematology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.