Back

Multi-Scale Kinetics Modeling and Advanced Assay for mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Potency Assessment

Yang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, K.; Liu, Y.; Sanyal, G.; Whitford, P. C.; Rouhanifard, S. H.; Xie, W.

2025-10-01 systems biology
10.1101/2025.09.29.679406 bioRxiv
Show abstract

mRNA lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) technology has attracted global attention, especially in vaccine development, due to its superior delivery efficiency, molecular stability, and safety profile. However, evaluating mRNA-LNP potency--defined as the quantifiable biological response elicited by the product--remains costly and time-consuming when relying solely on in vitro experiments. Rapid and reliable potency assessment is hindered by limited mechanistic understanding of delivery processes and sparse experimental data. To address these challenges, we present a mechanism-informed, multi-scale kinetic modeling framework that quantitatively captures the coupled dynamics across particle-level, cellular, and macroscopic scales. This model incorporates variability in LNP-cell interactions and accounts for critical factors such as dosage, LNP and cell size distributions, and cell proliferation dynamics--all of which influence delivery efficiency and response variability. By integrating advanced multi-omics assays--such as single-molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH), which enables single-cell resolution of mRNA and protein expression--our framework leverages heterogeneous, multi-scale data to support mechanistically grounded modeling of mRNA delivery and enable robust predictions of therapeutic potency. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=143 SRC="FIGDIR/small/679406v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (63K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f3ec2borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1163893org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dc530borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d0264a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.0%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
4
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.3%
7
Biotechnology Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Integrative Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.4%
18
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
22
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
24
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
27
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
28
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
30
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%