Body Composition Changes with Semaglutide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Giorelli, G.; Mizumoto, M.; Sartoretto, S.; Giorelli, S.; Giorelli, P.; Bedin-Pochini, A.; Toledo, D.; Barreto, G.; Saunders, B.
Show abstract
IntroductionSemaglutide is an effective intervention for weight loss, but the relative contributions of fat and fat-free mass (FFM) to total weight loss remain unclear. MethodsThis was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating semaglutide use in adults living with overweight or obesity. Searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus through April 2025. Eligible trials reported baseline and post-treatment measures of body mass, fat mass, and FFM. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines, and risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. Random-effects models were applied, with linear or quadratic functions fitted as appropriate. ResultsSeven RCTs involving 452 participants (259 semaglutide, 193 placebo) met the inclusion criteria. Semaglutide produced significant non-linear weight loss (0.04 kg/day; 95% CI 0.03-0.05; p<0.0001), primarily due to fat mass reduction (0.03 kg/day; 95% CI 0.01-0.05; p=0.007). FFM declined linearly at a smaller rate (0.007 kg/day; 95% CI 0.003-0.010; p=0.0001). Certainty of evidence was moderate. ConclusionSemaglutide induces substantial reductions in body and fat mass, with modest FFM loss. Clinical strategies combining semaglutide with resistance exercise and nutritional support may help preserve lean mass and optimize long-term outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of phentermine/topiramate in adults with overweight or obesity: A meta-analysis and systematic review 95%
- Interscapular fat is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance independent of visceral fat mass 91%
- The Pediatric Obesity Microbiome and Metabolism Study (POMMS): Methods, Baseline Data, and Early Insights. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effects of Weight Loss and Incretin-Based Therapies on Endothelial Vasodilatory and Fibrinolytic Function 92%
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists modestly reduced blood pressure among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and meta-regression 92%
- Clinical Characteristics Of Users Of Weight Loss Drugs: Population-Based Case-Control Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Upregulated miR-200c may increase the risk of obese individuals to severe COVID-19 92%
- Obesity, walking pace and risk of severe COVID-19: Analysis of UK Biobank 92%
- Characteristics and outcomes of 627 044 COVID-19 patients with and without obesity in the United States, Spain, and the United Kingdom 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transforming Obesity Prevention for CHILDren (TOPCHILD) Collaboration: protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity 95%
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 94%
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectory of weight regain after cessation of GLP-1 receptor agonists: a systematic review and nonlinear meta-regression 95%
- Suicide and depression in former contact sports participants: population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis 90%
- Novel type 2 diabetes prediction score based on traditional risk factors and circulating metabolites: Model derivation and validation in two large cohort studies 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.