Classification of Communication and Head Movement Behaviors during Multi-Person Conversations using Deep Learning
Early, A.; Chhabra, A.; Ozmeral, E. J.; Lertpoompunya, A.; Eddins, D. A.; Higgins, N. C.
Show abstract
Head movements play a pivotal role while engaged in multi-talker conversation by providing non-verbal feedback to partners and enhancing a listeners ability to separate sound sources. Commercial hearing-aids with an on-board IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit, i.e., accelerometers) typically use that information for step-counting and activity levels. At least one device uses it as an input to their environment classifier and integrated directional microphone. None, however, use the IMU to detect specific patterns of head movements to predict behaviors such as nodding, head shaking, listening to a person versus a video, or talking. Training an automatic classifier to accurately detect these behaviors first requires collecting head movement data during multi-person conversation and laboriously annotating each behavior-type for each participant with high temporal precision. From that point, with the goal of training the most accurate model and integrating with the hardware in the hearing aid to improve device performance, the question is how best to model the data. To address this gap, we collected accelerometer data during natural multi-person conversations and paired it with detailed human annotations of communication and head-movement behaviors. Head-movement data was collected from three cohorts of young, normal-hearing individuals (three per cohort) in a controlled, conference-room setting during 50-minute multi-talker conversations. Participants wore hearing aids with on-board accelerometers, and audio-video was recorded for each talker. Videos were manually annotated for communication and head-movement behaviors, including conversational turns and nonverbal cues such as tilts and nods. Temporal and spectral features were extracted from the accelerometer data (windowed into 1-second segments) corresponding to roll and pitch movements. These features, combined with the annotated behaviors, were used to train and test machine learning models. Models were trained on data from all but one participant and then tested on the held-out participant, repeating this procedure across all individuals. Several deep learning and classical machine learning models were compared for classifying communication behaviors (e.g., talking, listening, watching video) and head orientations (e.g., turning left or right, facing down, facing forward). More specifically, various sequence-to-sequence models, a state-of-the-art deep learning technique, were utilized. These models incorporated modern architectural components such as transformer networks. Multiple performance metrics were used to evaluate models, and results suggest that modern deep learning models outperform classical machine learning methods by significant margins. Classification performance improved further when temporal sequence information was incorporated. These results indicate that during multi-talker conversation, hearing-aid accelerometers can automatically classify stereotypical behaviors with high temporal resolution (1-second). Even when tested on unseen subjects, the models remained reliable. This establishes a foundation for more advanced approaches that combine behavioral and movement patterns, further integrate temporal dynamics, and incorporate additional inputs to improve accuracy and ecological validity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-time control of a hearing instrument with EEG-based attention decoding 95%
- 'Are you even listening?' - EEG-based decoding of absolute auditory attention to natural speech 94%
- Towards Decoding Selective Attention Through Cochlear Implant Electrodes as Sensors in Subjects with Contralateral Acoustic Hearing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analyzing wav2vec embedding in Parkinson’s disease speech: A study on cross-database classification and regression tasks 94%
- Measuring Repositioning in Home Care for Pressure Injury Prevention and Management 93%
- Statistical and machine learning models for classification of human wear and delivery days in accelerometry data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols 95%
- Magnified interaural level differences enhance spatial release from masking in bilateral cochlear implant users 94%
- Representations of fricatives in sub-cortical model responses: comparisons with human consonant perception 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.