Pre-Omicron Immunity Generates IgG⁺ but Not IgA⁺ Memory B Cells Reactive to Omicron Spike Protein
Tsoleridis, T.; Singh, I.; Onion, D.; Chappell, J. G.; Kelly, A.; Nightingale, J.; Valdes, A. M.; Ollivere, B. J.; Hoehn, K. B.; Urbanowicz, R. A.; Ball, J. K.
10.1101/2025.09.26.678818 bioRxivShow abstract
The emergence of the Omicron variant marked a major antigenic shift from previous SARS-CoV-2 variants. While the emergence of new variants of concern was associated with loss of protection from infection, protection from serious disease was maintained. What was less clear was whether this protection was associated with expansion, affinity maturation of pre-existing cross-reactive B cells, or de novo generation of variant-specific B cells. To define the cross-reactivity of memory B cell populations generated through infection and/or vaccination with pre-Omicron variant spike, we utilised archived samples from healthcare workers enrolled in the extensively monitored Panther study cohort. Using samples collected from Omicron-naive individuals approximately three months (106 days) after a third BNT162b2 vaccine dose, we analyzed the spike-specific B cell repertoire via multiparameter flow cytometry and B cell receptor (BCR) sequencing. Reactivity to both Lineage A and Omicron spike proteins was higher for serum IgG than IgA, and serum neutralisation potency was significantly reduced against pseudoviruses bearing the Omicron spike compared to those with Lineage A spike. The frequency of Omicron-reactive IgA+ B cells was markedly lower than that of Lineage A-reactive cells, whereas Omicron-reactive IgG+ memory B cells were more frequent. These responses were predominantly localized to classical memory and double-negative (DN) B cell subsets. BCR sequencing of donors unexposed to Omicron confirmed that Omicron-binding clones were class-switched and somatically mutated, indicating they originated from pre-existing memory B cells primed by vaccination or infection. Our findings demonstrate that memory B cells generated through infection and/or immunisation with pre-Omicron variants were primed for broad antigenic recognition despite Omicrons extensive genetic divergence. However, the diminished IgA+ B cell frequency suggests a weakened mucosal antibody defence, potentially explaining the continued susceptibility to infection despite preserved protection from severe disease.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Specific induction of double negative B cells during protective and pathogenic immune responses 95%
- Long-term T cell perturbations and waning antibody levels in individuals needing hospitalization for COVID-19 95%
- Memory B cell and humoral responses elicited by Sputnik V in naïve and COVID-19-recovered vaccine recipients 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Regulation of B cell function and expression of CD11c, T-bet, and FcRL5 in response to different activation signals 95%
- Mobilization of tissue-resident memory CD4+ T lymphocytes and their contribution to a systemic secondary immune reaction 95%
- Aging and viral evolution impair immunity against dominant pan-coronavirus-reactive T cell epitope 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- CD4+ Mucosal-associated Invariant T (MAIT) cells express highly diverse T cell receptors 95%
- Expansion of SARS-CoV-2-specific Antibody-secreting Cells and Generation of Neutralizing Antibodies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 94%
- Single cell based high-throughput Ig and TCR repertoire sequencing analysis in rhesus macaques 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell transcriptomic and TCR analysis of human Cytomegalovirus (hCMV)-specific memory T cells reveals effector and pre-effectors of CD8+- and CD4+-cytotoxic T cells 94%
- Whole blood-based measurement of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses reveals asymptomatic infection and vaccine efficacy in healthy subjects and patients with solid organ cancers 94%
- Tolerance induction in memory CD4 T cells is partial and reversible 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.