Population Screening For Human Papillomavirus In Women In The Metropolitan Area Of Tunja City, Boyaca
Salamanca Neita, L. H.; Guio Mahecha, E. X.; Huertas Valero, M. G.; Marin Suarez, J.; Carvajal Rojas, J. P.; Camargo Villalba, G. E.; Ramirez-Lopez, L. X.
Show abstract
BackgroundHuman Papillomavirus (HPV) detection is traditionally performed using cervicovaginal or vaginal cuff samples. However, first-void urine has also proven to be suitable for detecting HPV DNA. This could facilitate access to viral screening tests. The objective of this research was to determine and compare the presence of HPV genotypes in cervicovaginal and urine samples from women in Tunja, Colombia. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted on 161 women aged 20 to 65 living in Tunja. Cervicovaginal/vaginal cuff and urine samples were collected to detect HPV genotypes. Concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and association with sociodemographic/gynecological variables were evaluated. ResultsHPV prevalence was 29.2% in cervicovaginal samples, while in urine it was 32.9%. Genotypes 52 and 68 were the most prevalent in both cervical and urine samples. Comparison of HPV detection between samples revealed weak concordance (kappa=0.392). Sensitivity and specificity of viral detection in urine were 61.7 and 78.9, respectively. A significant positive association was found in women aged 18-37 who had initiated sexual activity early and had menarche before age 13. ConclusionsThe prevalence of HPV infection was low. High-risk genotypes were identified in both types of samples. The diagnostic performance of the urine test was low, demonstrated by the heterogeneity of the results between the two samples.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproductive health needs of Human papillomavirus (HPV) Positive women: A systematic review 97%
- Reasons for non-attendance to cervical cancer screening and acceptability of HPV self-sampling among Bruneian women: A cross-sectional study 97%
- Associations between genetic HPV 16 diversity and cervical cancer prognosis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of co-infection between high-risk human papillomavirus and common sexually transmitted infections in cervical specimens 95%
- Antimicrobial resistance and treatment failures in symptomatic and asymptomatic Mycoplasma genitalium infections in São Paulo, Brazil: Evidence from a cross-sectional study of sexual health clinic attendees 92%
- Consensus for Integrating the Point-of-Care Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT) into Sexually Transmitted Infection Management Guidelines: Results from a Two-Round Modified Delphi Survey. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of Human Papillomaviruses DNA in paired peripheral blood and cervix samples patients with cervical lesions and healthy individuals 98%
- Blastocystis in the cervix of Polish women: a subtype found in a parenteral location is different to that found in the anus 93%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cervical Cancer Screening Outcomes for HIV-positive Women in the Lubombo and Manzini regions of Eswatini – Prevalence and Predictors of a Positive Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) Screen 95%
- Usability and acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based hepatitis C virus self-testing among the general population and men who have sex with men in Malaysia 94%
- Factors Associated with the Ability of Adolescent Girls and Young Women (AGYW) in Sexual Unions to Negotiate for Safer Sex. An Analysis of Data from the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus infections in sequential male sex partners of young females 93%
- Association between male circumcision and human papillomavirus infection in males and females: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression 90%
- Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.