A multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer disease is associated with cognitive decline, hippocampal atrophy and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations
Kurniansyah, N.; Tasaki, S.; Rehman, H.; Zhu, C.; Farrell, J.; Sherva, R.; Hauger, R.; Merritt, V. C.; Panizzon, M. S.; Zhang, R.; Gaziano, J. M.; Gim, J.; Lee, K.; Lee, D. Y.; Nho, K.; Vialle, R. A.; Mukherjee, S.; Trittschuh, E. H.; Lee, A. J.; Brickman, A. M.; Cruchaga, C.; Risacher, S.; Greve, D. N.; Crane, P. K.; VA Million Veteran Program, ; Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium, ; Alzheimer Disease Sequencing Project, ; Martin, E.; Bush, W.; Mayeux, R.; Haines, J. L.; Pericak-Vance, M. A.; Logue, M.; Bennett, D. A.; Barnes, L. L.; Saykin, A.; Hohman, T.; Wang, L.-S.; Schellenberg,
Show abstract
Alzheimer disease (AD) has a strong genetic basis, yet previously derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) are heavily weighted by the APOE locus and perform inconsistently across diverse ancestries. We developed an APOE-independent multi-ancestry AD PRS using genome-wide association study summary statistics from cohorts in the United States, Europe and East Asia that were applied to European ancestry (EA), African American (AA), Caribbean Hispanic (CH), and East Asian cohorts from the Alzheimers Disease Genetics Consortium. PRS performance was evaluated in the multi-ancestry Alzheimers Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) dataset and validated in several additional multi-ancestry cohorts. The PRS was significantly associated with AD in the ADSP EA, AA, CH, and Native American Hispanic groups with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) between 1.14 and 1.52 per standard deviation of the PRS. PRS performance was validated in the replication cohorts (ORs 1.21-1.65). The PRS was also associated with poorer memory, executive function, and language performance; greater AD-related neuropathological burden (including CERAD, Braak stage, and Thal phase scores); reduced hippocampal volume; lower CSF A{beta}42; and elevated total tau and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), with stronger p-tau associations observed in women. Longitudinal analyses revealed that individuals in the highest PRS decile exhibited the steepest cognitive decline, particularly among those who progressed to AD. Our findings demonstrate the utility of an ancestry-aware and APOE-independent PRS for advancing understanding of the genetic basis of AD across diverse populations. Associations observed with early biological and cognitive changes and potential sex-specific differences support the incorporation of a PRS in clinical trials and personalized intervention and prevention strategies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell-type-specific Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk scores are associated with distinct disease processes in Alzheimer’s disease 99%
- Individual bioenergetic capacity as a potential source of resilience to Alzheimer’s disease 98%
- DNA methylation signatures of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology in the cortex are primarily driven by variation in non-neuronal cell-types 98%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptome-wide analyses delineate the genetic architecture of expression variation in atopic dermatitis 96%
- A Specialized Reference Panel with Structural Variants Integration for Improving Genotype Imputation in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) 95%
- The genetic architecture of Alzheimer disease risk in the Ohio and Indiana Amish 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies expands knowledge of the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and highlights potential translational opportunities 97%
- Spatial and single-nucleus transcriptomic analysis of genetic and sporadic forms of Alzheimer's Disease 96%
- Atlas of genetic effects in human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.