Development of a Core Outcome Set for Neurological Disorders (COS-Neuro): an AI-Assisted Thematic Framework Analysis
Tiong, S. P.; Yang, X.; Touzet, A. Y.; Millward, C. P.; Zipser, C. M.; Tetreault, L.; Gharooni, A.; Davies, B. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundNeurological disorders affect approximately 3 billion people globally, yet clinical trial success is often hindered by poorly selected outcome measures, impacting trial design, compliance, and interpretation. Over the past 25 years, Core Outcome Sets (COS) have emerged as standardized tools to enhance outcome selection, ensuring comparability across studies and reflecting the priorities of both researchers and patients. Despite the success of COS initiatives in other fields, their development in neurology remains limited, leaving many trialists without disease-specific guidance. ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop a COS framework for neurological disorders with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) by analysing the frequency and scope of outcomes previously reported in existing COS to identify common themes applicable to neurological research. MethodsCOS-Neuro was developed using AI-assisted thematic framework analysis, complemented by expert review. A modified five-step thematic analysis was conducted without pre-determined codes: O_LIDataset Gathering - Data was collected from the COMET database, and COS domains for neurological disorders were coded. C_LIO_LIPrompt Design & Testing - Large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT 3.5, Google Gemini 1.5 Flash and Meta Llama-2-70b, were trialled, and prompts refined based on their outputs. C_LIO_LIThematic Analysis - LLMs categorised domains into core areas. C_LIO_LIHuman Refinement - Experts reviewed LLM-generated core areas and selected those most appropriate for further interpretation. C_LIO_LIClinical Validation - Experts validated the domains, core areas, and concepts. C_LI This approach integrated AI with expert oversight to develop a standardised COS framework for neurological disorders. ResultsUtilising LLMs, particularly ChatGPT, a robust conceptual framework for COS in neurological disorders was developed, based on the existing 112 existing COS. Through adaptation of the OMERACT model, the final framework comprised four concepts, 13 core areas, and 75 domains, as determined by expert consensus. ConclusionCOS-Neuro establishes AI-assisted framework for developing COS in neurological disorders. This project provides a foundational resource for future COS research and serves a reference for designing trials in areas where established COS are lacking. Furthermore, it sets a precedent for the integration of AI in qualitative analysis in medicine, demonstrating the scalability of approaches like OMERACT for the development of COS of COS across various specialties.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 pandemic impact on continuity of care provision on rare brain diseases and on Ataxia, Dystonia and PKU. A scoping review protocol 94%
- Developing a taxonomy of care coordination for people living with rare conditions: A qualitative study 91%
- Utilization of CoRDS Registry to Monitor Quality of Life in Patients with VCP Multisystem Proteinopathy 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 94%
- Development of a knowledge translation platform for ataxia: Impact on readers and volunteer contributors 93%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 91%
- Artificial Intelligence's Contribution to Biomedical Literature Search: Revolutionizing or Complicating? 90%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Impacting Quality of Life in Multiple System Atrophy 90%
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 89%
- Application of Digital Tools and Artificial Intelligence to the Myasthenia Gravis Core Examination 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 92%
- Management and outcomes of myelomeningocele-associated hydrocephalus in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 92%
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.