Back

Analgesic quality and safety of selective supraclavicular nerves and C5 root blockade in clavicle surgery - A randomized controlled trial

Schaefer, M. J.

2025-09-22 anesthesia
10.1101/2025.09.22.25336305 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClavicle fractures and acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are common in athletic adults. Although peripheral nerve blocks are widely used in upper extremity surgery, their role in clavicle surgery remains debated due to the complex innervation. This study assessed whether selective blockade of the supraclavicular nerves and C5 root is a suitable technique for improving postoperative pain management. MethodsIn this randomized trial (German Clinical Trial Registry DRKS ID: DRKS00017286), 56 patients undergoing clavicle or AC joint surgery were allocated to three groups. The first group received general anesthesia with a combined nerve block of the supraclavicular nerves and C5 root (NSCL+C5), the second received general anesthesia only with C5 root block (C5), and the third had general anesthesia with systemic analgesia (control group). Pain levels (NRS) and piritramide consumption were the primary endpoints, while secondary endpoints included diaphragmatic excursion and oxygen saturation to assess phrenic nerve palsy. ResultsPatients in the NSCL+C5 group reported no pain during the first postoperative hour (NRS t0-t1=0), significantly less than the C5 (NRS t0=1.9 {+/-} 1.4, P=0.001) and control group (NRS t0=4.5 {+/-} 2.2, P<0.001). No additional opioid was required, which was significantly lower compared with 4.4 mg {+/-} 5.3 (P=0.01) in the C5 group and 12.6 mg {+/-} 5.3 (P<0.001) in the control group. Phrenic nerve palsy was more frequent in the NSCL+C5 group, without affecting oxygen saturation. ConclusionCombined blockade of the supraclavicular nerves and C5 root significantly reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption in clavicle surgery. Despite a higher rate of phrenic palsy, respiratory function remained unaffected.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.