Back

Cortically Interfaced Human Avatar Enables Remote Volitional Grasp and Shared Discriminative Touch

Cater, E. L.; Wandelt, S.; Jangam, A.; Elias, Z.; Ibroci, E.; Maffei, C.; Griffin, D.; Bickel, S.; Ben-Shalom, N.; Stein, A.; Mehta, A.; Chandrasekaran, S.; Bouton, C.

2025-09-22 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.09.21.25336267 medRxiv
Show abstract

Restoring sensorimotor function in individuals with severe paralysis remains an important challenge in the field of medicine. Here we show, for the first time, an individual with severe upper-limb sensorimotor impairment can interact with real-world objects through another individual using an implanted brain-computer interface (iBCI) and wireless muscle activation, while also engaging in cooperative rehabilitation. This human avatar paradigm enabled the iBCI study participant to generate motor intent signals, decoded in real time, to control the hand of other participants wirelessly through high resolution neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Working with an able-bodied participant, the iBCI participant achieved volitional control of the other participants hand to discriminate objects of different compliance with 64% accuracy (p < 0.001) under blindfolded conditions. Discrimination was enabled by an S1 encoding paradigm combining multi-electrode recruitment and graded amplitude, which yielded perceptual accuracies exceeding 90% during calibration. Extending this paradigm, the iBCI participant worked with another participant with upper limb impairment and collaborated in a cooperative task: the iBCI participants decoded motor commands drove spinal cord and neuromuscular stimulation in the other participants arm, enabling bottle pouring with a 94% success rate (p < 0.0001). Qualitative interviews revealed strong subjective satisfaction, highlighting the potential of this form of cooperative rehabilitation. These findings show that cortically interfaced human avatars can restore both motor control and discriminative sensation across individuals, introducing a new framework for cooperative iBCI-based rehabilitation and perhaps even remote human interaction in the future.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.