Back

Pre-existing antibodies and age shape the immune response following EV-A71 vaccine: a prospective serological study among the Chinese pediatric population

Zhou, J.; Zhou, X.; Chen, J.; Grassly, N. C.; Yu, H.

2025-09-17 infectious diseases Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.09.17.25335968 medRxiv
Show abstract

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), primarily caused by enterovirus A71 (EV-A71), poses significant pediatric health risks in the Asia-Pacific region, with vaccination being critical for prevention. Using longitudinal serological data from 1 585 Chinese children in a 2019-2020 prospective study (combining clinical trial and cohort samples), the present study assessed how pre-vaccination antibody titers and age influence EV-A71 vaccine response. EV-A71-specific antibodies were measured via a modified cytopathogenic effect assay, with geometric mean titers (GMTs) and fold increases (GMFIs) analyzed. At baseline, 3.9% (N = 61) of children were seropositive. After vaccination, those with high pre-existing titers exhibited higher GMTs, compared to those with low-level or undetectable titers (GMTs: 10.30 [95% CI: 9.09, 11.52] vs. 7.58 [95% CI: 6.86, 8.29] vs. 6.92 [95% CI: 6.82, 7.02]; GMFIs: 3.36 [95% CI: 1.97, 4.75] vs. 4.23 [95% CI: 3.48, 4.98] vs. 4.92 [95% CI: 4.82, 5.02]). Generalized additive models revealed that predicted GMTs peaked (8.78) at a baseline titer of 10.20, while GMFIs declined with higher pre-vaccination titers. Vaccine-induced responses also varied with age, showing periodic increases in children under 36 months. Collectively, these findings quantify the effects of pre-existing antibodies and age on the antibody level following vaccination, highlighting the importance of tailoring immunization schedules based on both pre-existing immunity and age. Accordingly, immune-naive children should be vaccinated as early as possible.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.