Back

Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Heart Failure With Preserved or Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Khan, R.; Narayanan, D. H.; Chidurala, R.; tejaswini, H. k.; Patel, P.; Vanguru, R. V.; Kalpeshbhai, P. Y.; Lakshmi, S.; Nandakishor, N.; Ramteke, H. D.

2025-09-14 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.09.13.25335677 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionHeart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) accounts for nearly half of all heart failure cases, yet effective therapies remain limited. Finerenone, a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, offers anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects with improved safety compared to steroidal MRAs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of finerenone in HFpEF/HFmrEF. MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus through September 2025, including only randomized controlled trials. Data extraction and risk of bias (RoB 2) assessments were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled log risk ratios log (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. ResultsTen RCTs comprising 33,544 patients (20,279 males, 13,202 females) with a mean follow-up of 16.15 months were included. Finerenone significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; log RR -0.11 [- 0.17, -0.05], p<0.001; I{superscript 2}=0%). All-cause mortality (log RR - 0.58, p=0.06), cardiovascular mortality (log RR -0.36, p=0.06), and rehospitalization (log RR - 0.66, p=0.07) trended favorably but were not statistically significant. Hyperkalemia risk was significantly increased (log RR 0.73, p<0.001). ConclusionFinerenone reduces MACE with an acceptable safety profile, albeit with higher hyperkalemia risk. These findings support finerenone as a promising therapy for HFpEF/HFmrEF, complementing existing treatment strategies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.