Back

DeepCRI: Real-time EEG-based Prognostication after Cardiac Arrest

van Putten, M. J. A. M.; Keijzer, H.; Hofmeijer, J.; Buscher-Jungerhans, P.; Beishuizen, A.; Tjepkema-Cloostermans, M.

2025-09-15 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.09.13.25334650 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate prediction of neurological outcome after cardiac arrest is essential for guiding intensive care decisions. Electroencephalography (EEG) supports prognostication; however, interpretation relies on expert judgment and is often subjective and delayed. We developed DeepCRI, a bedside-integrated deep learning system that produces continuously updated prognostic trajectories during the first 36 hours after arrest. DeepCRI uses time-dependent decision boundaries to define good-, poor-, and gray-zone regions over time, and applies a lock-in rule that fixes classification only after sustained, concordant high-confidence evidence within a compact temporal window, thereby preventing transient threshold crossings from driving decisions. During model development in a cohort of 522 patients, DeepCRI achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.97 at 24 h, with low calibration error (ECE=0.049). Independent validation was performed in an internal (n=219) and an external cohort (n=167). In the internal validation, DeepCRI provided lock-in classifications in 81.7% of patients, achieving 100% specificity for poor outcome with a sensitivity of 49.5%, and 95.5% sensitivity for good outcome at 73.2% specificity; 18.3% remained in the gray zone. Performance in the external validation cohort was lower: 59.9% locked, and a single false predictions reduced poor-outcome specificity to 98.4%. Post hoc analysis indicated residual EMG artifacts contributed to this false poor-outcome prediction. By embedding DeepCRI into routine ICU EEG infrastructure, we demonstrate the technical feasibility and clinical promise of continuous, real-time AI-driven prognostication for comatose patients after cardiac arrest.

Published in Resuscitation · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.