Perceived indoor temperature extremes are associated with sleep health among women in the United States

IntroductionIndoor temperature extremes contribute to thermal discomfort and can threaten sleep health. Few studies have investigated indoor temperature-sleep associations, especially across differentially-exposed sociodemographic groups. MethodsUsing cross-sectional Sister Study data (2017-2019), we estimated associations between perceived sleep-disrupting indoor temperature extremes (SDITE) and sleep dimensions. Eligible women reported frequent vs. infrequent SDITE considered too hot or too cold and sleep dimensions (sleep duration; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index-derived sleep disturbances; healthcare professional-diagnosed sleep apnea). Adjusting for trouble sleeping for reasons other than temperature, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinical characteristics, we used Poisson regression with robust variance to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsAmong 33,545 women (mean{+/-}SD age = 67{+/-}8.5 years), 90% self-identified as non- Hispanic White, 6.6% as non-Hispanic Black, and 3.7% as Latina, and 27% reported an annual household income (AHI) [≤]$49,999 while 37% reported an AHI $50,000-$99,999 and 37% reported an AHI [≥]$100,000. Prevalence of too hot SDITE was highest among non-Hispanic Black women (15% vs. 9.0% overall) and women with an AHI [≥]$100,000 (11%); too cold SDITE prevalence was highest among Latina women (3.8% vs. 1.4% overall) and women with an AHI [≤]$49,999 (2.2%). Too hot and too cold SDITE were consistently associated with long sleep onset latency (LSOL) (PRhot=1.89 [1.75-2.04] and PRcold=1.99 [1.70-2.33]) and daytime dysfunction (PRhot=1.76 [1.23-2.51] and PRcold=4.69 [2.83-7.76]). ConclusionsPerceived SDITE were associated with insomnia symptoms and may contribute to sleep disparities given the higher burdens often observed among Black women, Latina women, and women with lower annual household incomes.