Association of road traffic noise exposure with dementia or cognitive impairment - a systematic review of longitudinal cohort studies
Scaria, E. B.; Dhanda, N. N.
Show abstract
BackgroundRoad traffic noise is a major public health concern that is associated with various cardiometabolic and neurological disorders. Dementia poses a significant health and socioeconomic burden. Existing systematic reviews have not explored the link between road traffic noise exposure alone, and risk of dementia or cognitive impairment. This review aims to identify and summarise available evidence linking road traffic noise exposure with risk of dementia or cognitive impairment. MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus and GreenFile were searched for studies on road traffic noise exposure and the risk of dementia or cognitive impairment among adults from inception to July 2025 without restrictions on setting or geographical location. Studies were identified using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Results3296 studies were retrieved from the searches, of which 3264 were excluded and 32 underwent full text screening. 8 studies were narratively synthesised. Quality assessment of the studies revealed that they were good quality and only one study was prone to a high risk of bias. The findings suggest that adults exposed to high levels of road traffic noise exposure, particularly >50 dB, compared to those exposed to lower levels of road traffic noise are at higher risk of developing dementia or cognitive impairment. ConclusionThere is a positive association between road traffic noise and dementia or cognitive decline. However, the amount of good-quality evidence is low and larger longitudinal studies using robust methods are needed. Such research could have significant implications on infrastructure planning and development of regulations to prevent adverse health effects due to road traffic noise.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rural Roads to Cognitive Resilience (RRR): A prospective cohort study protocol 92%
- Rationale and study protocol of the MAMELI Cohort study (MApping the Methylation of repetitive elements to track the Exposome effects on health: the city of Legnano as a LIving lab) 91%
- The Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI): A prospective cohort study protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brick kiln pollution and its impact on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Long-term effects of a coalmine fire on hospital and ambulance use: an interrupted time series study 91%
- Using low-cost sensors and GPS to assess spatiotemporal variations in personal exposure to PM2.5 in the Washington State Twin Registry 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A test-negative case-control study with additional population controls 90%
- Optimising activity and diet compositions for dementia prevention: Protocol for the ACTIVate prospective longitudinal cohort study 90%
- Impact of disasters, including pandemics, on cardiometabolic outcomes across the life-course: A systematic review 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: a best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis 90%
- A randomized sham-controlled trial of transcranial and intranasal photobiomodulation in Japanese patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to Alzhimer’s disease: a protocol 89%
- Efficacy of a multiple-component and multifactorial personalized fall prevention program in community-dwelling older adults at moderate-to-high fall risk: The PRE.C.I.S.A. Randomized Controlled Trial 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.