Back

Precision Medicine in Education: Using Clustering Analysis for Personalized Student Support in Medical Training

Sanjaya, A.; Edwin, C.; Paskaria, C.; Mianto, N. A.; Alviani, R.; Gunawan, K.

2025-09-12 medical education
10.1101/2025.09.09.25335466 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBurnout, stress, and psychological distress are prevalent among medical students, undermining academic performance and well-being. Traditional one-size-fits-all interventions have shown limited effectiveness, highlighting the need for precision student support. This study applied unsupervised learning to classify medical students into clusters and examined their academic and psychological characteristics. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 677 medical students. Psychological distress (DASS-21), burnout (SBI), resilience (ARS-24), coping strategies (Brief-COPE), and learning environment perception (DREEM-12) were assessed. Spectral clustering identified four profiles, validated through resampling. ANCOVA compared GPA and psychological measures across clusters, adjusting for covariates. Focus group discussions provided qualitative validation. ResultsFour clusters were identified. Cluster C was the most at-risk, showing high distress, low resilience, and poor academic performance. Cluster A also reported high stress but buffered through resilience and adaptive coping. Cluster B exhibited the strongest resilience and lowest stress. Cluster D achieved the highest GPA, but with moderate resilience and coping scores. ANCOVA confirmed significant differences (p < 0.001) across clusters, independent of covariates. Qualitative findings reinforced these profiles, highlighting mechanisms such as stigma reframed as motivation (Cluster A), autonomous and thriving (Cluster B), lack of autonomy and maladaptive coping (Cluster C), and fairness-sensitive students (Cluster D). ConclusionClustering analysis reveals psychologically distinct student groups with distinct support needs. Across clusters, precision student support should cultivate autonomy, resources, fairness, and scaffolding, aligning interventions with subgroup characteristics. These insights can inform tailored strategies to improve academic performance, reduce burnout, and foster resilience in medical education.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.