Effect of low dose naltrexone for long covid: a systematic review
Byambasuren, O.; Atkins, T. J.; Baptista, S.; Glasziou, P.; Chakraborty, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundLong covid is a debilitating chronic condition, and the effect of low dose naltrexone (LDN) on its symptoms is unclear. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of LDN on symptoms of long covid. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for published studies; ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for registered ongoing studies from inception to 1 May 2025. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials or pre-post studies in patients with long covid reporting on fatigue, quality of life, cognition, or other symptoms. Risk of bias was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale. ResultsOf 226 titles and abstracts screened, no randomised controlled trials were identified. Four observational pre-post studies from USA and Ireland (n=155) met inclusion criteria. LDN doses varied from 1mg/d to 6 mg/d. Pooled analyses showed moderate effects for reducing fatigue (Hedges g= -0.74; 95% CI [-1.11, -0.37]; p<0.001), brain fog (Hedges g= - 0.53; 95%CI [-1.01, -0.05]; p=0.03), and improving sleep quality (Hedges g= -0.60; 95%CI [-0.91, -0.30]; p=0.0001), and large effects for pain (Hedges g= -0.93; 95%CI [-1.29, -0.57]; p<0.001) and daily functioning (Hedges g= -0.93; 95%CI [-1.29, -0.57]; p<0.0001) in favour of LDN. Heterogeneity ranged from 0% to 62%. Risk of bias was assessed as low in all four studies. No serious adverse events were reported in the two studies that assessed safety. ConclusionLimited evidence from small pre-post studies suggests LDN may improve fatigue, cognition, sleep, pain, and functioning in long covid. However, certainty of evidence is low. Well-powered trials are urgently needed to confirm efficacy, determine dosing and duration, and identify subgroups most likely to benefit. Protocol registrationOpen Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C2VKX
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence of Long-term Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Related to Pain and Other Symptoms: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune activation and immune-associated neurotoxicity in Long-COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 82 studies comprising 58 cytokines/chemokines/growth factors. 92%
- Six-month sequelae of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study of 10,024 breakthrough infections 88%
- Poor sleep quality, insomnia, and short sleep duration before infection predict long-term symptoms after COVID-19 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing Long COVID in an International Cohort: 7 Months of Symptoms and Their Impact 91%
- The angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist C21 restores respiratory function in COVID19 - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial 90%
- Early treatment with nitazoxanide prevents worsening of mild and moderate COVID-19 and subsequent hospitalization 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse events of iron and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in preoperatively anaemic elective surgery patients: a systematic review 91%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 90%
- Repurposing Existing Medications for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Protocol for a Rapid and Living Systematic Review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.