Muscle Stiffness, Not Force, Limits Human Force Production
Tessari, F.; Hogan, N.
Show abstract
Humans have a remarkable ability to manage physical interaction despite a tremendously complex musculoskeletal system, comparatively slow muscles and slow neural communication. Most physical interaction tasks require force generation, and that can compromise stability. To ensure stability, muscles are required to produce a certain mechanical impedance (especially stiffness and damping). In this work we investigate the human limits of force generation and test whether and how those limits are constrained by our ability to stabilize the task. Moreover, we also study how strongly limb configuration - known to play a key role in transmitting muscle tension to hand force - matters in the generation of force. We devised an experiment in which healthy individuals performed a maximum voluntary pushing task using a custom-designed gimbal apparatus which allowed us to conditionally change the ability to transmit torque at the wrist, thus enabling or disabling stabilization via wrist pronation-supination, ulnar-radial deviation, and flexion-extension. The experiment was repeated in two different arm configurations (preferred and undesired) to assess the effect of limb configuration. The results showed: (i) a statistically significant and substantial decrease in maximum output force with less wrist ability to generate stabilizing torque, and (ii) a significant but minimal difference in maximum pushing force between the two arm configurations. Interestingly, subjects unexpectedly improved their maximum pushing performance between pre- and post-experiment, suggesting a negligible effect of fatigue and a possible effect of learning. Our findings confirm our hypothesis that force production appears to be limited by stiffness production. Muscles do not primarily generate force, but generate mechanical impedance.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Disturbance as a Force for Good in Motor Learning 96%
- Discover Your Potential: The Influence of Kinematics on a Muscle's Ability to Contribute to the Sit-to-Stand Transfer 95%
- Asymmetry in kinematic generalisation between visual and passive lead-in movements are consistent with a forward model in the sensorimotor system 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the time structure of descending activation that generates movements at different speeds 96%
- Estimating descending activation patterns from EMG in fast and slow movements using a model of the stretch reflex 96%
- Reward actively engages both implicit and explicit components in dual force field adaptation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transfer of learned object manipulations between two- and five-digit grasps 95%
- Preparation duration shapes the goal-directed tuning of stretch reflex responses 95%
- Extended practice improves the accuracy and efficiency of goal-directed reaching guided by supplemental kinesthetic vibrotactile feedback 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.