Beekeeping for Mental Health Prevention and Wellbeing: A Pro-Environmental Qualitative Study in an Underserved Adolescent Community
Demir-Kassem, S.; Deeks, R.; McCabe, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundUntreated mental health difficulties in adolescence increase the risk of poor outcomes in adulthood. Preventive interventions can improve wellbeing but remain underutilized, particularly among underserved youth who experience high stress and limited access to support. This study examined whether engaging in a pro-environmental activity, beekeeping, could promote mental health and preventive wellbeing benefits in adolescents. MethodsSixteen adolescents (aged 14 to 18) from the youth-led charity Together As One, Slough, UK, which supports vulnerable young people from low-income and marginalized backgrounds, participated in a 12-session beekeeping program. Sessions combined hands-on hive management, educational workshops, and apiary visits. Program impact was explored through semi-structured interviews and a focus group, with data analysed thematically. ResultsFour themes were identified: (1) Motivations and challenges: curiosity, social encouragement, occasional fear and boredom; (2) Psychosocial benefits: reduced stress, enhanced emotional wellbeing, greater energy and structure, and stronger social connections; (3) Reconnecting with meaning: engaging in new activities, stepping outside comfort zones, and overcoming symptoms such as anhedonia; and (4) Environmental awareness: increased understanding of ecological systems and sustainability. ConclusionBeekeeping shows promise as a community-based, pro-environmental activity that can foster stress reduction, emotional regulation, social connectedness, and a sense of purpose in adolescents. These findings suggest that youth-led, nature-based interventions may represent an innovative and underutilized approach to preventive mental health support in underserved populations.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 95%
- Exploring the experiences of loneliness in adults with mental health problems: a co-produced participatory qualitative interview study 95%
- Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 92%
- Neuroscientific Insights into the Built Environment: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Indoor Environmental Quality, Physiological Dynamics, and Psychological Well-Being in Real-Life Contexts 92%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 94%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 92%
- Co-development of a best practice checklist for mental health data science: A Delphi study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 94%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 96%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 92%
- How did people cope during the COVID-19 pandemic? A Structural Topic Modelling Analysis of Free-Text Data from 11,000 UK Adults 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.