Back

Evaluating sequencing strategies for endometrial microbiome profiling in endometrial cancer: a comparative study of short- and long-read 16S rRNA approaches

Bebelman, S.; Artuyants, A.; Nijmeijer, B.; Fitzgerald, S.; Henry, C.; Blenkiron, C.

2025-09-07 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.09.02.673865 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy globally, with rising incidence and notable disparities in outcomes. In New Zealand, EC rates have increased significantly, particularly among M[a]ori and Pacific women, who face higher risks of advanced disease and poorer outcomes. Microbial dysbiosis has been implicated in EC pathogenesis, but characterising the uterine microbiome is challenging due to low microbial biomass and high contamination risk. AimsThis study aimed to pilot a protocol that could inform the preparation of a larger cohort trial. Short-read Illumina MiSeq and long-read Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) 16S rRNA gene sequencing were investigated to profile the uterine microbiome in people with EC. Methods and ResultsUterine and vaginal swabs were analysed to assess platform performance in terms of DNA recovery, sequencing success, diversity metrics, and taxonomic resolution. The impact of sample freezing or immediate lysis prior to DNA extraction was also evaluated. ONT sequencing provided enhanced species-level resolution and improved detection of low-abundance taxa but showed variable performance in low-yield samples. Freezing prior to cell DNA extraction modestly increased bacterial 16S copy numbers and improved community consistency. Contamination was a problem across both platforms, particularly in low-biomass samples, but can be minimised during data analysis. ConclusionThis study provides practical guidance for sequencing platform selection and sample handling in uterine microbiome research. Our findings support future efforts to elucidate microbial contributions to EC pathogenesis and highlight the importance of rigorous contamination control. Importantly, this is the first presentation of a New Zealand cohort and contributes valuable data from an underrepresented population and informs future research in diverse clinical settings.

Published in Cancer Reports · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.