Silicone toothbrushes: A scoping review of an underutilized tool in global oral health
Cummins, A.; Bennett, A.; Carrier, K.; Mehta, S. A. J.; Gudsoorkar, P.
Show abstract
Oral diseases are the most prevalent non-communicable diseases worldwide, affecting 3.5 billion people, with a disproportionate impact on those living in low- and middle-income countries. Despite being largely preventable through proper oral hygiene, current oral health promotion strategies rely heavily on plastic and nylon toothbrushes, which present both environmental and accessibility challenges. In response to the growing need for sustainable, affordable, and accessible preventive oral health solutions, there has been increasing interest in alternatives to conventional toothbrushes. This scoping review aimed to summarize the global literature on silicone toothbrushes, an underutilized tool in preventive oral care. A systematic search of five databases, supplemented by reference screening, identified ten English-language studies investigating silicone toothbrushes. Findings suggest that silicone toothbrushes are effective in plaque removal, have a lower risk of gingival trauma, are well-suited for specific populations, and perform better in environmental impact assessments. This review also demonstrated that silicone toothbrushes remain under-researched and underutilized, highlighting the need for further high-quality studies to evaluate their effectiveness, safety, and broader implementation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Projecting trends in the disease burden of adult edentulism in China between 2020 and 2030: a systematic study based on the global burden of disease 92%
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 90%
- Applying the Nova food classification to food product databases using discriminative ingredients: a methodological proposal 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.